I am trying to make my way to commiter , I'm the technical lead for HDFS,
MapRed, Yarn; 6 of us on the team. I took this requirement from our cloud
team but I have doubts about our April time frame . We would have to change
quite a bit of Hadoop code, looks like it's no small task
https://issues.ap
I just migrated HttpComponents to Log4j2, it's pretty simple. Let me know
if need help. Are you a Hadoop committer?
Gary
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Demetrios Dimatos
wrote:
> Ok great , now I have to get buy in to have all the Hadoop components to
> move to log4j2. I will keep you posted
Ok great , now I have to get buy in to have all the Hadoop components to
move to log4j2. I will keep you posted, thanks for the speedy replies .
On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Demetrios Dimatos >
> wrote:
>
> > Our needs don't really go bey
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Demetrios Dimatos
wrote:
> Our needs don't really go beyond file permissions, setting each Owner,
> Group, Other , but I would say if we go this far that we also be able to
> set the owner and the group for a file.
>
> If this is something you have run across bef
Our needs don't really go beyond file permissions, setting each Owner,
Group, Other , but I would say if we go this far that we also be able to
set the owner and the group for a file.
If this is something you have run across before and think it could benefit
with something more than what our needs
What do you plan beyond supporting
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/attribute/PosixFilePermission.html
?
Gary
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Demetrios Dimatos
wrote:
> Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the community would
> accept seeing as they rejec
Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the community would
accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back. Opening a JIRA
- Question now. Thanks.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.
>
> G
Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.
Gary
On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote:
> Ok, cool.
>
> Gary
>
> On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a
>> opening
>> a
Ok, cool.
Gary
On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a opening
> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> Thank you ,
>
> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > Which version of Log4j ar
Hi Gary,
We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a opening
a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
Thank you ,
On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Which version of Log4j are you using?
>
> Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j
Which version of Log4j are you using?
Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j 1.
For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
Thank you,
Gary
On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" wrote:
> Hello All,
> We would like to hear the communities thoughts on
Hello All,
We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to configure
the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely on UMASK
because we have managed services who's process should generate logs with a
644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640 b
Reported here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1693
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Please do open an issue. Otherwise, this will probably get lost in the
> mailing lists.
>
> On 10 November 2016 at 18:33, Benjamin Jaton
> wrote:
>
> > I have a weird problem w
13 matches
Mail list logo
