> > changelog.
> > >
> > > On 13 April 2017 at 09:29, Jaromir Hamala <jaromir.ham...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I wonder whether log4j could add (optional) buffering into the
> Cons
ke
> sure
> > to file a JIRA ticket as well so we have something to refer to in the
> > changelog.
> >
> > On 13 April 2017 at 09:29, Jaromir Hamala <jaromir.ham...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I wonder whether
use case. Patches are always welcome! Make sure
> to file a JIRA ticket as well so we have something to refer to in the
> changelog.
>
> On 13 April 2017 at 09:29, Jaromir Hamala <jaromir.ham...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I wonder whether lo
d add (optional) buffering into the Console
> Appender.
> I believe it could be useful e.g. when the stdout is redirected to a file
> (think of Maven Surefire), etc.
>
> Would you accept a patch adding this?
>
> Cheers,
> Jaromir
>
> --
> “Perfection is achieved,
Hello,
I wonder whether log4j could add (optional) buffering into the Console
Appender.
I believe it could be useful e.g. when the stdout is redirected to a file
(think of Maven Surefire), etc.
Would you accept a patch adding this?
Cheers,
Jaromir
--
“Perfection is achieved, not when