Re: Appender's append() method

I guess that AppenderLoggingException can be used for that purpose. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Your appender is automatically wrapped by an AppenderControl object. The > AppenderControl will inspect the ignoreExceptions flag so your

Re: Appender's append() method

ling logging the exception so you don’t even have to catch the > exception to do that. > > Ralph > > > On Jan 13, 2016, at 7:49 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote: > > > > Also, why would we not just rethrow whatever exception we caught? > > > &

RE: Appender's append() method

believe I've seen this happen before, if I'm attempting to override a method which doesn't indicate it throws exceptions, won't the compiler complain if I attempt to throw an exception from that method? Thanks, Nick > Subject: Re: Appender's append() method > From: ralph.go...@dslextre

Re: Appender's append() method

ppen before, if I'm attempting to > override a method which doesn't indicate it throws exceptions, won't the > compiler complain if I attempt to throw an exception from that method? > > Thanks, > Nick > >> Subject: Re: Appender's append() method >> From: ralph.go..

Re: Appender's append() method

> compiler complain if I attempt to throw an exception from that method? > > Thanks, > Nick > > > Subject: Re: Appender's append() method > > From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > > Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:50:41 -0700 > > To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org > > &g

Re: Appender's append() method

er exception we caught? > > Thanks, > Nick > >> Subject: Re: Appender's append() method >> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com >> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:28:11 -0700 >> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org >> >> Sorry, that was what I meant. >>

Re: Appender's append() method

r problem which appears to be due > to the fact that the append() method is not marked as throwing exceptions? > > Thanks, > Nick > >> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:17:47 -0800 >> Subject: Re: Appender's append() method >> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com >> To: log4j

Re: Appender's append() method

IMO a RuntimeException subclass is appropriate while RuntimeException should not be used. Gary On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Your appender is automatically wrapped by an AppenderControl object. The > AppenderControl will inspect the

Re: Appender's append() method

Sorry, that was what I meant. Ralph > On Jan 13, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > IMO a RuntimeException subclass is appropriate while RuntimeException > should not be used. > > Gary > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Ralph Goers

RE: Appender's append() method

Thanks for the info. What about the compiler problem which appears to be due to the fact that the append() method is not marked as throwing exceptions? Thanks, Nick > Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:17:47 -0800 > Subject: Re: Appender's append() method > From: garydgreg...@gmail.com > To

RE: Appender's append() method

Also, why would we not just rethrow whatever exception we caught? Thanks, Nick > Subject: Re: Appender's append() method > From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:28:11 -0700 > To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org > > Sorry, that was what I meant. > >