Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
OFF has a value of 0. What would it mean to have a value less than that?
Ralph
On Aug 29, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Nicholas Duane nic...@msn.com wrote:
I got log4j 2.3 installed and verified that custom levels are working for
me now. However, I
I got log4j 2.3 installed and verified that custom levels are working for me
now. However, I did noticed you can't set the intValue to a negative number.
Is that by design?
Thanks,
Nick
From: nic...@msn.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: RE: custom levels via configuration
to a negative number.
Is that by design?
Thanks,
Nick
From: nic...@msn.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: RE: custom levels via configuration
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:34:13 -0400
That would certainly be a possible explanation. I'm working on figuring out
how to upgrade to log4j
Users List log4j-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
OFF has a value of 0. What would it mean to have a value less than that?
Ralph
On Aug 29, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Nicholas Duane nic...@msn.com wrote:
I got log4j 2.3 installed and verified that custom
Ideally that I couldn't turn it off.
Thanks,Nick
Original message
From: Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
Date: 08/29/2015 9:51 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: Log4J Users List log4j-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
OFF has a value of 0. What would
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
This:
Logger name=HelloWorld level=ALL
is only going to match:
static Logger log = LogManager.getLogger(HelloWorld.class.getName());
if the class in unpackaged, which it looks it is based on this paste but I
a 'yum list log4j' it says
I have 2.0-1.fc21.
Thanks,
Nick
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:46:51 -0700
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
This:
Logger name=HelloWorld level=ALL
is only going to match:
static
This:
Logger name=HelloWorld level=ALL
is only going to match:
static Logger log = LogManager.getLogger(HelloWorld.class.getName());
if the class in unpackaged, which it looks it is based on this paste but I
want to double check that you did not omit anything from the example.
Are you using
On to my next problem. I'm trying to define a custom level in configuration.
Not sure if it's working or not. However, when I attempt to get the level for
that custom level I get back null, which I wasn't expecting. Here is the
log4j2.xml config file:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
log4j' it says I have 2.0-1.fc21.
Thanks,
Nick
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:46:51 -0700
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
This:
Logger name=HelloWorld level=ALL
is only going to match:
static Logger log
Yes I am a true noob to java and linux and log4j.
What is gitmaster? I assume related to github somehow? How can I see the test
you created? Is there a link you can provide?
Thanks,
Nick
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:34:45 -0700
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
From: garydgreg
: custom levels via configuration
From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
This:
Logger name=HelloWorld level=ALL
is only going to match:
static Logger log
(LogManager.java:473)
at HelloWorld.clinit(HelloWorld.java:7)
Thanks,
Nick
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:36:40 -0700
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
We've never released a version 2.0-1.fc21 so it must be a Fedora build
Nick,
What was the output of this program? Were both INFOM1 and INFOP1 not found,
or was INFOM1 found (because it is used in the ThresholdFilter), but not
INFOP1?
Remko
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Nicholas Duane nic...@msn.com wrote:
On to my next problem. I'm trying to define a
Both were not found from my HelloClass. And I had sent out some log4j logging
in where there was a warning which I assume was related to me using INFOM1 in
the threshold filter.
Thanks,
Nick
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:20:20 +0900
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
From: remko.po
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
From: remko.po...@gmail.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
Nick,
What was the output of this program? Were both INFOM1 and INFOP1 not
found,
or was INFOM1 found (because it is used in the ThresholdFilter), but not
INFOP1?
Remko
That would certainly be a possible explanation. I'm working on figuring out
how to upgrade to log4j 2.3. Hopefully that will solve my custom levels issue.
Thanks,
Nick
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:05:02 -0700
It seems my custom levels aren't working as I'm getting null from
Level.getLevel() when passing those custom level names.
Thanks,
Nick
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:34:43 +0900
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
From: remko.po...@gmail.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
I
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
We've never released a version 2.0-1.fc21 so it must be a Fedora build,
presumably based on 2.0 or some fork of it.
You need to test with version 2.3 or a 2.4-SNAPSHOT. I'll leave you
2015 12:36:40 -0700
Subject: Re: custom levels via configuration
From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
We've never released a version 2.0-1.fc21 so it must be a Fedora build,
presumably based on 2.0 or some fork of it.
You need to test with version 2.3 or a 2.4
20 matches
Mail list logo
