Re: log4j vs log4jextras v1.x

2017-11-17 Thread Remko Popma
Not sure, you’d have to try. But be aware that Log4j 1.2 has been End of Life for 2 years now and is known to be broken on Java 9. We recommend everyone to upgrade to Log4j2. Log4j2 has better performance and can be configured to be garbage free. Just switching to Log4j2 is likely to speed

Re: log4j vs log4jextras v1.x

2017-11-17 Thread Alex O'Ree
Understood, but if I needed log4extras, would I just have just log4extras on the classpath or (log4jextras and log4j) on the classpath On Nov 17, 2017 1:36 PM, "Ralph Goers" wrote: > Log4jextras was extra stuff for Log4j 1. Log4j 1 is not longer supported > so

Re: log4j vs log4jextras v1.x

2017-11-17 Thread Ralph Goers
Log4jextras was extra stuff for Log4j 1. Log4j 1 is not longer supported so neither would be log4jextras. Ralph > On Nov 17, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Alex O'Ree wrote: > > Sorry if this has been asked before, but i'm not clear on whether or not > log4jextras is a replacement

log4j vs log4jextras v1.x

2017-11-17 Thread Alex O'Ree
Sorry if this has been asked before, but i'm not clear on whether or not log4jextras is a replacement for log4j or an add on? I've running into some issues where they are both in the classpath causing a conflict between the Appender interface and am looking for solutions. Thanks!