Not sure, you’d have to try.
But be aware that Log4j 1.2 has been End of Life for 2 years now and is known
to be broken on Java 9.
We recommend everyone to upgrade to Log4j2. Log4j2 has better performance and
can be configured to be garbage free. Just switching to Log4j2 is likely to
speed
Understood, but if I needed log4extras, would I just have just log4extras
on the classpath or (log4jextras and log4j) on the classpath
On Nov 17, 2017 1:36 PM, "Ralph Goers" wrote:
> Log4jextras was extra stuff for Log4j 1. Log4j 1 is not longer supported
> so
Log4jextras was extra stuff for Log4j 1. Log4j 1 is not longer supported so
neither would be log4jextras.
Ralph
> On Nov 17, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Alex O'Ree wrote:
>
> Sorry if this has been asked before, but i'm not clear on whether or not
> log4jextras is a replacement
Sorry if this has been asked before, but i'm not clear on whether or not
log4jextras is a replacement for log4j or an add on?
I've running into some issues where they are both in the classpath causing
a conflict between the Appender interface and am looking for solutions.
Thanks!