Let me, as a log4j user, give my 2 cents. I looked at the Java 1.4
logging classes and decided they were inferior to log4j. Since log4j is
an external JAR, it will not only be available in JDK1.4 but also in
1.5, ... and you can already use them in 1.3. So log4j is the way to go.
Tom
Matthias
Some people may disagree
Yup ;-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
while not incurring the potential pains of Commons Logging.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Tbee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:59 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: Log4J vs. java.util.logging
Admittedly, many of us at here at log4j-user
Unless I am mistaken, commons-logging was always dynamic. It always used
classloader tricks to determine which logging API to use.
Ok, then I stand corrected (and need to reread the articles ;-).
Tom
-
To unsubscribe,
Is it possible to put envirinment variables into the configuration file?
Not as far as I know.
The reason I ask is that I develop on a windows machine, and deploy onto
a linux, so the paths where I want to store the logs are differant.
If it is not possible, does anyone have a suggestion
Just making sure: note that these are system properties, not environment
variables. You need to use -D when starting java to transport individual
environment variables to the system properties.
Quoting Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As Alison Ortega mentioned, log4j configurators support the
Okay, here is something interesting. I mentioned my problems with log4j.debug
before, but had to reinstall my laptop (Oracle and Informix were getting in
each others hair) and before I was back at this point... Anyway.
Sometimes when I set the log4j.debug log4j is not debugging, but I do get
