Log4Net 1.3.0

2013-11-06 Thread Nick Williams
Guys, LOG4NET-393 is causing us some problems at $work. It's fixed as of 1.3.0, which doesn't appear to be released yet. Is there an expected date for it to be released, and if not what can I do to help make this happen? And while I have your attention, I noticed that we released the log4net

Re: Log4Net 1.3.0

2013-11-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-11-06, Nick Williams wrote: LOG4NET-393 is causing us some problems at $work. It's fixed as of 1.3.0, which doesn't appear to be released yet. Is there an expected date for it to be released, and if not what can I do to help make this happen? If you need anything fast, then it is

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4NET-391) XmlLayoutSchemaLog4j does permit logging without properties

2013-11-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Bodewig updated LOG4NET-391: --- Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) XmlLayoutSchemaLog4j does permit logging without

Re: Log4Net 1.3.0

2013-11-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-11-06, Dominik Psenner wrote: Since LOG4NET-393 is a blocker for people who work a lot with lambda expressions and right now we have absolutely no idea as of when 1.3 will be ready we might better release 1.2.13 containing the fix for the issue. Yeah, no problem with that, I'll try to

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4NET-394) Lambda-based ILog-Extensions should catch errors

2013-11-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Bodewig updated LOG4NET-394: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3.0) 1.2.13 Lambda-based ILog-Extensions

[jira] [Reopened] (LOG4NET-393) Using dynamic methods with log4net causes NullReferenceException in StackFrameItem

2013-11-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Bodewig reopened LOG4NET-393: Assignee: Stefan Bodewig (was: Dominik Psenner) Using dynamic methods with log4net

[jira] [Resolved] (LOG4NET-393) Using dynamic methods with log4net causes NullReferenceException in StackFrameItem

2013-11-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Bodewig resolved LOG4NET-393. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3.0) 1.2.13

RE: Log4Net 1.3.0

2013-11-06 Thread Joe
And while I have your attention, I noticed that we released the log4net NuGet package for 1.2.10 as 1.2.10, but 1.2.11 and 1.2.12 were 2.0.0 and 2.0.1, respectively. 1.2.12 was then re-released as 2.0.2. Since I've only been with Apache Logging since the spring and I'm completely new to

Re: Log4Net 1.3.0

2013-11-06 Thread Dominik Psenner
Maybe we can craft some other small and easy fixes that we can ship with 1.2.13. 2013/11/6 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org On 2013-11-06, Dominik Psenner wrote: Since LOG4NET-393 is a blocker for people who work a lot with lambda expressions and right now we have absolutely no idea as

Re: Log4Net 1.3.0

2013-11-06 Thread Dominik Psenner
Ideally there would be two different packages for the strong name and the new name, but this has to be discussed with the package maintainer. 2013/11/6 Joe jocular...@hotmail.com And while I have your attention, I noticed that we released the log4net NuGet package for 1.2.10 as 1.2.10, but

Re: Log4Net 1.3.0

2013-11-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-11-06, Dominik Psenner wrote: Maybe we can craft some other small and easy fixes that we can ship with 1.2.13. Oh, even though I've already tagged the sources in svn don't let that hold you back, tags are cheap. Look through JIRA if you see anything you feel fits and we'll go from

AW: Log4Net 1.3.0

2013-11-06 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 2013-11-06, Dominik Psenner wrote: Maybe we can craft some other small and easy fixes that we can ship with 1.2.13. Oh, even though I've already tagged the sources in svn don't let that hold you back, tags are cheap. Look through JIRA if you see anything you feel fits and we'll go from