[GitHub] log4net pull request #44: make RollingFileAppender.RollOverTime(bool fileIsO...

2017-03-09 Thread yarick123
GitHub user yarick123 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/log4net/pull/44 make RollingFileAppender.RollOverTime(bool fileIsOpen) virtual to be … …possible to extend functionality by sub-classing You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

2017-03-09 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Donnerstag, 9. März 2017 um 19:24 schrieben Sie: > We use general as mainly an announcement list for topics that might > be of general interest to all logging projects. Generally, these are just > release announcements. And "general-dev@" is not an option because one

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

2017-03-09 Thread Ralph Goers
We use general as mainly an announcement list for topics that might be of general interest to all logging projects. Generally, these are just release announcements. Ralph > On Mar 9, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Yeah, I agree that the user lists can remain

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

2017-03-09 Thread Matt Sicker
Yeah, I agree that the user lists can remain separate as it doesn't cause any issues currently. The main idea here is whether we should merge the dev lists into one, or if we need a common dev list for all devs to subscribe to (general@ doesn't sound appropriate, but I don't know what that list is

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-556) Rolling file appender only recognises dates in yyyy-MM-dd format.

2017-03-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15903339#comment-15903339 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-556: Thanks Steven, I guess I've gotten carried away by my

[Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

2017-03-09 Thread Ralph Goers
You should note that while we consider all votes only PMC votes are “binding”. I don’t think that changes much however. From a PMC perspective I have to say that keeping the user’s lists separate isn’t likely to be an issue as most of the things that would need to be discussed would be on a

Re: [VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

2017-03-09 Thread Dominik Psenner
The votes are way too scattered over the different mailing lists so that I didn't even find my own vote. ;-) Therefore I'm trying to summarize the current state of the vote: log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ ->d...@logging.apache.org Matt Sicker: +1 Ralph Goers: +1 Stefan

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.8 Based on RC1

2017-03-09 Thread Dominik Psenner
Of course, this is just something I've noticed while clicking through the site and it is definitely not a blocker for 2.0.8. On 2017-03-09 09:13, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-03-08, Dominik Psenner wrote: I am looking through the release and am going to give a few feedbacks during the next

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.8 Based on RC1

2017-03-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2017-03-08, Dominik Psenner wrote: > I am looking through the release and am going to give a few feedbacks > during the next hour. The first thing i noticed is this: > The website page 'features' still mentions that log4net has builds for > ancient .net framework versions. We should change