Thought of that too, but I decided to let it be in UTF8 cause its the
most
compatible format nowadays whereas ASCII is somewhat antique. What do
you
think?
IIUC ASCII would have been the implicit body encoding for log4net
1.2.12 so when looking for a backwards compatible default this would be
On 2013-11-14, Dominik Psenner wrote:
I'm not sure whether setting the encoding to UTF8 triggers some sort of
different handling inside of the framweork's SMTP code even if the test
was pure ASCII. If it doesn't, then I'm fine with UTF8.
and checking a few of my Gmail's mails it seems they
To me it looks like I've broken the prior behaviour while trying to fix
LOG4NET-354 and LOG4NET-405 remedies that. *ouch*
Quoting:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.mail.mailmessage.headerse
ncoding(v=vs.110).aspx
The value of the HeadersEncoding property defaults to
On 2013-11-13, Dominik Psenner wrote:
To me it looks like I've broken the prior behaviour while trying to fix
LOG4NET-354 and LOG4NET-405 remedies that. *ouch*
I see
Quoting:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.mail.mailmessage.bodyenco
ding(v=vs.110).aspx
The default
Thought of that too, but I decided to let it be in UTF8 cause its the most
compatible format nowadays whereas ASCII is somewhat antique. What do you
think?
2013/11/13 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
On 2013-11-13, Dominik Psenner wrote:
To me it looks like I've broken the prior behaviour
On 2013-11-13, Dominik Psenner wrote:
Thought of that too, but I decided to let it be in UTF8 cause its the most
compatible format nowadays whereas ASCII is somewhat antique. What do you
think?
IIUC ASCII would have been the implicit body encoding for log4net
1.2.12 so when looking for a
0
LOG4NET-405 jumped in and I am about to commit a fix.
+1
with following questions/remarks:
no build for .NET 4.5, but I assume this was already discussed before and is
planned for a subsequent release
do we position “net” binaries as targeting only MS .NET, or are they suppose to
be cross-CLR / cross-platform?
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Great to see you here, Gert!
On 2013-11-10, gert.drie...@telenet.be wrote:
no build for .NET 4.5, but I assume this was already discussed before
and is planned for a subsequent release
We introduced the 4.0 builds in 2011 mainly because of the new security
model. Without that the 2.0 version
Stefan,
Thanks for the feedback, and thank you and Dominic for breathing new life into
log4net!
Professionally I’m back to working with a .NET technology stack, so I’ll also
try find time to contribute to .NET OSS projects again.
Gert
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Verzonden: zondag 10
+1
Note: i have no Windows machine and was not able to verify building or other
technical checks. I have tested formal requirements though
On 10 Nov 2013, at 9:54, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all,
per discussion of the last few days we intend to cut a final(?) release
from the 1.2.x branch
On 2013-11-10, gert.drie...@telenet.be wrote:
Professionally I’m back to working with a .NET technology stack, so
I’ll also try find time to contribute to .NET OSS projects again.
very much looking forward to it.
Stefan
12 matches
Mail list logo
