Re: Tie::Hash::Regex vs Tie::RegexpHash

2001-05-25 Thread Steve Keay
In T::R, the keys that you use in the hash are all treated as regexes. In effect you're saying if you look up a value using a key that matches this regex, then return this value. An added complication is that the key/value pairs are _ordered_ (the underlying object is an array, not a hash) so

Re: Bah!

2001-05-10 Thread Steve Keay
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 05:04:23PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: I've been made redundant. Anyone want an Evil Programmer? http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/cv funky server set up: [steve@webcache steve]$ telnet www.cantrell.org.uk 80 Trying 195.149.50.61... Connected to

Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module.

2001-03-30 Thread Steve Keay
Yes, it's useful. I like nslookup. (Plus I feel that dig is pretty verbose, but maybe there's a flag to control that that I've been too lazy to look for.) I guess it depends on application. If you need to know the nuts and bolts of a query, use dig. If you only need a quick resolution