Re: streaming output

2001-05-17 Thread Dave Liney
From: Robert Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Philip Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] At a guess: Content-Encoding: gzip instead. Yep that worked, According to RFC2616 Content-Encoding: x-gzip should have worked as well: Use of program names for the identification of encoding formats

Re: streaming output

2001-05-16 Thread Philip Newton
Robert Thompson wrote: print Content-Type: application/octet-stream\n; print Content-Transfer-Encoding: x-gzip\n\n; At a guess: Content-Encoding: gzip instead. I've had a look at the relevant rfc's. Which ones? RFC 2616 (HTTP/1.1) mentions gzip not x-gzip under 3.5 Content Codings and 3.6

RE: streaming output

2001-05-16 Thread Robert Thompson
From: Philip Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] At a guess: Content-Encoding: gzip instead. Thanks, I'll give that a try. I've had a look at the relevant rfc's. Which ones? RFC 2616 (HTTP/1.1) mentions gzip not x-gzip under 3.5 Content Codings and 3.6 Transfer Codings. I was

RE: streaming output

2001-05-16 Thread Robert Thompson
From: Philip Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] At a guess: Content-Encoding: gzip instead. Yep that worked, thanks Rob - I must memorise rfc's I must memorise rfc's I must memorise rfc's