* at 14/03 10:37 -0500 Dave Cross said:
... and how much trouble you can get in for not knowing the difference:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/13/208259
the best thing about this is the number of links to this story that
give the impression the kids were arrested for not knowing
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is indeed lovely. Although you don't need to do tunnelling magic:
rsync -options -e ssh source-list me@myserver:/destination
rsync is a wonderful beast. The -a and -z options, accompanied by
--progress (if they're big files) and --delete (for
At Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:52:07 + (GMT), Mark Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
but that wouldn't work on Win32 platforms as they seem to insist on
double quotes to delimit command arguments.
Speak for yerself, I use bash on my windoze box ;-)
Thanks everyone.
That exposes my lack of familiarity with the q qq operators ;-)
Another little bit of learning learned.
S.
Well, sort of. It's a repacking of some existing stuff - a second
edition of the Perl CD Bookshelf http://www.ora.com/catalog/perlcdbs2/
Looks like the contents of the new edition is:
* Programming Perl, 3rd Edition
* Perl for System Administration
* Perl in a Nutshell
* Perl Cookbook
*
Well, sort of. It's a repacking of some existing stuff - a second
edition of the Perl CD Bookshelf http://www.ora.com/catalog/perlcdbs2/
Looks like the contents of the new edition is:
* Programming Perl, 3rd Edition
* Perl for System Administration
* Perl in a Nutshell
* Perl Cookbook
*
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, you wrote:
Well, sort of. It's a repacking of some existing stuff - a second
edition of the Perl CD Bookshelf http://www.ora.com/catalog/perlcdbs2/
Looks like the contents of the new edition is:
* Programming Perl, 3rd Edition
* Perl for System Administration
* Perl
As a Perl novice I'd have to say the old version looks much better.
Just replacing Programming Perl would have been enough.
As another person at an early stage in my Perl self-development, I'll second
this, and add that I'd like to add the Owl book on regexps, although I
suppose that's not
David Cantrell wrote:
Quick question for any statisticians out there:
Does this look like it should be modelled with a Poisson distribution to
you? This data represents the number of logins on a workstation per hour.
Don't think so, there's too much of a dip at 11:00 and 14:00
Title: An enquiry
If this is anappropriate for this list the please accept my apologies.
Is anyone looking for an experienced web designer who is looking to pick up Perl and run with it?
Regards,
Darren Clarke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone going to XML One London next week? I'll be there until Wednesday,
but the Thursday didn't look any use to me.
--
Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Ok, print the message, then put it in your shoe and put your shoe in front
of the fireplace... then wait till Santa come and
From: Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
But there are alternatives. Does anyone here have any comments on
Perforce or Clearcase? Needless to say, both companies have crap
websites
with no useful documentation and a tonne of marketing arse.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:45:34PM -, Jim Gillespie wrote:
My main beef with CVS (and ClearCase) is that there doesn't seem to be any
way to access the release string programatically - I can tag all my source
as "FOO_R1-0" or whatever, but I can't tell from within the source that it
has been
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:45:34PM -, Jim Gillespie wrote:
But there are alternatives. Does anyone here have any comments on
Perforce or Clearcase?
Use Perforce. It's very good.
It took me quite a while to get the hang of ClearCase but I was growing to
like it by the end of my
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:45:34PM -, Jim Gillespie wrote:
Does ClearCase work with anything but Solaris? I was talking to my current
boss and he reckons it needs a patched kernel in order to do funky stuff
with the file system.
I know it works with NT (yeah, OK). What's worrying is
15 matches
Mail list logo
