I'm interested to know if anyone uses Safari to
read O'Reilly books online.
http://safari1.oreilly.com/tablhom.asp?home
It sounds like a good idea (must be better than
having 3 editions of Programming Perl) and I'm tempted to give it a go, so any
Safari subscribers out there with an opinion
NAME
Attribute::Abstract - implementing abstract methods with attributes
SYNOPSIS
package SomeObj;
use Attribute::Abstract;
sub new { ... }
sub write : Abstract;
DESCRIPTION
Declaring a subroutine to be abstract using this attribute causes a call
NAME
Attribute::TieClasses - attribute wrappers for CPAN Tie classes
SYNOPSIS
use Attribute::TieClasses;
my $k : Timeout(EXPIRES => '+2s');
# loads in Tie::Scalar::Timeout and tie()s $k with those options
DESCRIPTION
Damian Conway's wonderful `Attribute::Handle
* at 18/05 12:54 -0400 David H. Adler said:
> On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 08:20:47AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> > I finally received my copy of TPJ in the mail yesterday. And there was much
> > rejoicing :)
>
> If it makes anyone feel better, I just heard from Mr. Orwant that *his*
> copy hasn't a
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 08:20:47AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> I finally received my copy of TPJ in the mail yesterday. And there was much
> rejoicing :)
If it makes anyone feel better, I just heard from Mr. Orwant that *his*
copy hasn't arrived yet... :-)
dha, who thinks the overseas copies g
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 05:04:21PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> Has anyone tried Activestate's packaged perl 5.6 for Debian? I wouldn't
> normally consider them, but there's no other packaged 5.6 for Debian-
> stable.
I'd just run -testing. That to me would be less invasive and likely
to break
Has anyone tried Activestate's packaged perl 5.6 for Debian? I wouldn't
normally consider them, but there's no other packaged 5.6 for Debian-
stable.
--
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/
Rip, Mix, Burn, unless you're using our "most advanced operating sys
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:44:13PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
> This (non-perl unix command line tool) might be better than nothing:
>
> http://members01.chello.se/hampasfirma/ppsend/
Great, thanks, that's the ticket. Seems like it's a simple WAP/XML
interface. For anyone that's curious it
Thanks to Damian's Attribute::Handlers it's now possible to do what I
wanted to do for some time (but haven't quite gotten around to) and very
easily (and it's on its way to CPAN; suggestions/patches welcome):
use Attribute::Memoize;
sub fib :Memoize {
my $n = shift;
return $n
This (non-perl unix command line tool) might be better than nothing:
http://members01.chello.se/hampasfirma/ppsend/
--
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone aware of an interface either through the web or more directly
that will provide the usual paypal facilities through a perl interface?
didn't get any hits.
Paul
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 02:54:41PM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote:
> From: Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 11:04 AM
> > Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > > He was touring with Norman Lovett, who wasn't nearly as good.
> > I found Norman Lovett really funny. Managed t
* at 18/05 14:51 +0100 Cross David - dcross said:
> From: Robin Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 2:34 PM
>
> > On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:05:44AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> > > Im nogat samting til ridim insait long pastaim Klingon!
> > >
> > > Damian (longlong tisa Pe
From: Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 11:04 AM
> Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
>
> > He was touring with Norman Lovett, who wasn't nearly as good.
>
> I found Norman Lovett really funny. Managed to keep the whole audience
> laughing without actually saying anything for
From: Robin Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 2:34 PM
> On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:05:44AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> > Im nogat samting til ridim insait long pastaim Klingon!
> >
> > Damian (longlong tisa Perlpela)
>
> Lingua::TokPisin::Perlpela?
Nooo!
Damian - as
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:05:44AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> Im nogat samting til ridim insait long pastaim Klingon!
>
> Damian (longlong tisa Perlpela)
Lingua::TokPisin::Perlpela?
.robin.
--
"Have you been certain you came to me the real reason explain anything
else that I came to you t
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:04:15PM +0100, Neil Ford wrote:
>
> If you're getting it for the piccies, I would suggest you don't bother.
> Whilst SMG gets a full page, the picture of Miss Hannigan is small and a
> reprint of one of the ones from the photo shoot she did for FHM last year.
Give me a
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 12:21:47PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Now all I have to do is not volunteer for the p5p summary, Leon
You're a marked man, you realise?
--
"If that makes any sense to you, you have a big problem."
-- C. Durance, Computer Science 234
On 18/05/2001 at 12:21 +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
>Paul Mison posted about organising a second constrained walk:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/london-pm%40lists.dircon.co.uk/msg05221.html
Oops, just noticed the dangling footnote. Is the length of time between
post and footnote a record?
[0] Me,
This is the seventeenth weekly summary of the London Perl Mongers
mailing list. For the crazy week starting 2001-05-14:
Don't forget the London.pm website for meetings etc. The next meeting
is a social meeting apparently on Thursday 7th June which clashes with
elections:
http://london.pm.org/
It
OK. The first response I got were from Paul Makepiece, Peter Haworth, and
Leon. So that's the team. Simon was next - so he's the substitute (we'll use
him if Leon gets stolen by Amsterdam.pm again).
I'll go and register us now.
If anyone else wants to play, there's nothing to stop you entering
Leon Brocard wrote:
>
> Cross David - dcross sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > I need three volunteers to join me in the london.pm team for Jon Orwant's
> > Internet Quiz at The Perl Conference.
>
> If you'll accept me, I'd be happy to join you...
I'm up for it as well unless yo
Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> He was touring with Norman Lovett, who wasn't nearly as good.
I found Norman Lovett really funny. Managed to keep the whole audience
laughing without actually saying anything for a few minutes and thena
few minutes more just by saying "what?"
Simon
[easily amused]
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> This is the sort of thing that happens in the country i grew up in
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/northern_ireland/newsid_1336000/1336347.stm
>
Yeah .. right. Let me get this straight .. you're trying to tell me
you've actually grown
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 07:27:10AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> This is the sort of thing that happens in the country i grew up in
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/northern_ireland/newsid_1336000/1336347.stm
cue bad joke:
- Why do Free Presbyterians not have sex standing up?
- It mi
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 07:27:10AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> This is the sort of thing that happens in the country i grew up in
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/northern_ireland/newsid_1336000/1336347.stm
Is that Alan Cox in the Red Hat in that photo?
Inquiring minds wish t
On or about Fri, May 18, 2001 at 09:29:42AM +0100, Matthew Jones typed:
>"As far as it being sensual, that is not a word you would attribute to
>country music."
They obviously haven't been listening to The Archers recently.
R
Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Dave Cross writes:
> >
> > examples drawing heavily on the world of Buffy.
>
> Oh I remember now. In fact, I specifically remember rolling
> my eyes :-)
Admit it, you put those in because O'Reilly told you "we need you to
increase subscription numbers" :)
Cheers,
>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/northern_ireland/newsid_1336000/1336347.
stm
Oh! This has to get my Quote of the Week:
"As far as it being sensual, that is not a word you would attribute to
country music."
--
matt
so how you gonna kick it?
gonna kick it root down.
>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/northern_ireland/newsid_1336000/1336347.
stm
Maybe their reason is wrong, but banning line dancing is a worthy end,
surely? We could get rid of Steps at a stroke. Except Faye, of course.
--
matt
so how you gonna kick it?
gonna kick it root down.
> "What's it like then, Macbeth in Wol Wantok? An improvement..."
Im nogat samting til ridim insait long pastaim Klingon!
Damian (longlong tisa Perlpela)
Dave Cross writes:
> >It's been so long, I have to ask: what was my article in the most
> >recent TPJ? :-)
>
> It was a beginners guide to Arrays. Complete with examples drawing heavily
> on the world of Buffy.
Oh I remember now. In fact, I specifically remember rolling my eyes :-)
Nat
32 matches
Mail list logo
