* Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> There is a distinction to be drawn (which is kind of important,
> especially if you're a member of the opposition) between parliament.uk
> and gov.uk. Dunno what govt.uk is doing there though.
>
Governments are well aware of how bad people are at spe
Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:15:27AM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:06:07AM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> > > On 22/02/2001 at 16:24 +, Dave Cross wrote:
> > > >IIRC we also investigated the possibility of registering pm.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Michael Stevens wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:06:07AM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> > On 22/02/2001 at 16:24 +, Dave Cross wrote:
> > >IIRC we also investigated the possibility of registering pm.org.uk,
> > >but Nominet have a silly rule that prevents anyone from havin
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, you wrote:
> > From: Robin Szemeti [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Has anyone yet called French a glue language for English?
> >
> > ahh ... but what it boils down to is you are indulging in a little
> > horse play at the expense of our Gallic freinds. it is amusing to
>
> From: Robin Szemeti [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Has anyone yet called French a glue language for English?
>
> ahh ... but what it boils down to is you are indulging in a little
> horse play at the expense of our Gallic freinds. it is amusing to
> make thes little remarks on the hoof is it not?
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, you wrote:
> Has anyone yet called French a glue language for English?
ahh ... but what it boils down to is you are indulging in a little
horse play at the expense of our Gallic freinds. it is amusing to make
thes little remarks on the hoof is it not? ..
--
Robin Szemet
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:39:09AM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> > I actually think that it was worse than that - people had
> > been using the .pm TLD and then AFNIC got a little eggy about
> > it and stopped them.
>
> Which probably explains the number of IP addresses in links on
> http://www
* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Paul Mison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 22/02/2001 at 16:24 +, Dave Cross wrote:
> >
> > >IIRC we also investigated the possibility of registering pm.org.uk,
> > >but Nominet have a silly rule that prevents anyone from having third
> > >
Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> I still have a bunch of e-mails from the guy who runs the
> islands ISP ...
SPMcable?
> I actually think that it was worse than that - people had
> been using the .pm TLD and then AFNIC got a little eggy about
> it and stopped them.
Which probably explains the number o
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:15:27AM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:06:07AM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> > On 22/02/2001 at 16:24 +, Dave Cross wrote:
> > >IIRC we also investigated the possibility of registering pm.org.uk,
> > >but Nominet have a silly rule that preven
Paul Mison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 22/02/2001 at 16:24 +, Dave Cross wrote:
>
> >IIRC we also investigated the possibility of registering pm.org.uk,
> >but Nominet have a silly rule that prevents anyone from having third
> >level domains with only two characters :(
>
> But organisa
* Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From: "Leon Brocard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On a... related... topic: http://paris.mongueurs.net/
>
> "Il y a davantage que l'one-way pour le faire"
>
> Has anyone yet called French a glue language for English? If anyone does,
> take a video camera
On 22/02/2001 at 16:24 +, Dave Cross wrote:
>IIRC we also investigated the possibility of registering pm.org.uk,
>but Nominet have a silly rule that prevents anyone from having third
>level domains with only two characters :(
But organisations as diverse as the British Library, Parliament, t
Quoting Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Philip Newton sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > Someone brought up the possibility of the domain name london.pm.
>
> On a... related... topic: http://paris.mongueurs.net/
>
Woohahaha. Did you read their amazingly long, diligently kept u
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Richard Clamp wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 05:07:31PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> > So, no http://london.pm/ right now :-(
> >
> > But maybe in the future![1]
>
> Deja-Vu. We (being other people on the list, and not actually me)
> tried this about 2 years ago, with alm
From: "Leon Brocard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On a... related... topic: http://paris.mongueurs.net/
"Il y a davantage que l'one-way pour le faire"
Has anyone yet called French a glue language for English? If anyone does,
take a video camera and post it. You'd need a PhD in chemistry or work for
Pix
Dave Cross wrote:
> IIRC we also investigated the possibility of registering pm.org.uk,
> but Nominet have a silly rule that prevents anyone from having third
> level domains with only two characters :(
You could try pm.org. Oh, wait, you've already got that ;).
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton
Leon Brocard wrote:
> On a... related... topic: http://paris.mongueurs.net/
Wow. I especially like the second paragraph. It seemed like an exercise in
"how many times can we fit the words qw[Paris France Perl] into three
sentences". But the final sentence appears to bear them out :-)
Cheers,
Phi
Philip Newton sent the following bits through the ether:
> Someone brought up the possibility of the domain name london.pm.
On a... related... topic: http://paris.mongueurs.net/
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/
yapc::Europehttp
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:12:23PM +, Richard Clamp wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 05:07:31PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> > So, no http://london.pm/ right now :-(
> >
> > But maybe in the future![1]
>
> Deja-Vu. We (being other people on the list, and not actually me)
> tried this about
At Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:12:23 +, Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 05:07:31PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> > So, no http://london.pm/ right now :-(
> >
> > But maybe in the future![1]
>
> Deja-Vu. We (being other people on the list, and not actually me)
> tr
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 05:07:31PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> So, no http://london.pm/ right now :-(
>
> But maybe in the future![1]
Deja-Vu. We (being other people on the list, and not actually me)
tried this about 2 years ago, with almost exactly the same results.
Back then they were going
22 matches
Mail list logo
