Does anybody know if LWP::Simple allow for un@pw:url convention?
--james.
PGP signature
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 01:38:41PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know if LWP::Simple allow for un@pw:url convention?
oops un:pw@url
--
James A. Duncan
W: www.fotango.com
P: +44 207 251 7021
F: +44 207 608 3592
PGP signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know if LWP::Simple allow for un@pw:url convention?
For FTP URLs? Or HTTP URLs? Or what?
For FTP URLs: don't know. For HTTP URLs: no such thing. (NB: just because
MSIE or insert browser of choice parses such URLs doesn't mean they exist
in any standard
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 01:38:41PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know if LWP::Simple allow for un@pw:url convention?
Yes it does.
Wouldn't it have been quicker to try it than to write that
message? ;-)
.robin.
--
Flee to me, remote elf!
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Robin Houston wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 02:44:30PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
For FTP URLs: don't know. For HTTP URLs: no such thing.
Technically you're right. LWP does support it though.
And so does every other user agent in the universe,
pretty much; so you'd
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 01:50:31PM +, Robin Houston wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 01:38:41PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know if LWP::Simple allow for un@pw:url convention?
Yes it does.
Wouldn't it have been quicker to try it than to write that
message? ;-)
Well
Robin Houston wrote:
And so does every other user agent in the universe,
pretty much; so you'd have to be a pretty severe
standards pedant to say there was no such thing ;-)
Well, isn't being precise part of being a programmer? "Pedantic" is
basically just "precise", only a little more
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 02:59:13PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
Well, isn't being precise part of being a programmer? "Pedantic" is
basically just "precise", only a little more extreme. But "you can't just
make sh*t up and expect the computer to understand what you want,
Retardo!"[1] --
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Philip Newton wrote:
Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Robin Houston wrote:
And so does every other user agent in the universe,
pretty much; so you'd have to be a pretty severe
standards pedant to say there was no such thing ;-)
Lynx doesn't.