* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 01:35 21/04/2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> >* Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >> "You can't just make up any old shit and expect the computer to
> > know what
> > >> you mean, retardo!"
> > >
> > > Hey! Stop undermining the sole bas
Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 01:35 21/04/2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> >* Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >> "You can't just make up any old shit and expect the computer
> > to know what
>
> > >> you mean, retardo!"
> > >
> > > Hey! Stop undermining the sole b
At 01:35 21/04/2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>* Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> "You can't just make up any old shit and expect the computer to
> know what
> >> you mean, retardo!"
> >
> > Hey! Stop undermining the sole basis of my entire career!
> >
>
>go to sleep, what time
* Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> "You can't just make up any old shit and expect the computer to know what
>> you mean, retardo!"
>
> Hey! Stop undermining the sole basis of my entire career!
>
go to sleep, what time do you call this! ;-)
--
Greg McCarroll
> "You can't just make up any old shit and expect the computer to know what
> you mean, retardo!"
Hey! Stop undermining the sole basis of my entire career!
Damian
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote:
> Mark Fowler wrote on the 20th April:
>
> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Robin Houston wrote:
> >
> > > You want to take arbitrary languages, and execute them as if they
> > > were Perl. I want to take Perl and execute it as if it were an
> > > arbitrary l
From: Mark Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 11:37 AM
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Robin Houston wrote:
>
> > You want to take arbitrary languages, and execute them as if they
> > were Perl. I want to take Perl and execute it as if it were an
> > arbitrary language :-)
>
> Here
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Robin Houston wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:57:01PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> >
> > Funny. You've come across the same idea I did.
> > http://simon-cozens.org/pg.pdf
>
> Having now read your paper, I think that in some ways it's the
> *opposite* idea; or at least a c
From: Robin Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 11:04 AM
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:57:01PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> >
> > Funny. You've come across the same idea I did.
> > http://simon-cozens.org/pg.pdf
>
> Having now read your paper, I think that in some way
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:57:01PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>
> Funny. You've come across the same idea I did.
> http://simon-cozens.org/pg.pdf
Having now read your paper, I think that in some ways it's the
*opposite* idea; or at least a complementary one.
You want to take arbitrary languages
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:50:46PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote:
> The slides for the talk I gave this evening are online at
> http://London.pm.org/~robin/semantic-talk/0.title.html ff.
Funny. You've come across the same idea I did.
http://simon-cozens.org/pg.pdf
--
?warning: write might change g
11 matches
Mail list logo
