Re: London.pm nearly have a new server (fwd)
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote: OK Groovers, The DNS has been set up so now london.pm.org is penderel.state51.co.uk as outlined below. The only problem with this is that the http server doesnt appear to be running at the moment and there is no-one alive on #london.pm who has a login - could someone who can kick the server into life and check the content is up to date. /J\ -- Jonathan Stowe | http://www.gellyfish.com | I'm with Grep on this one http://www.tackleway.co.uk |
Re: London.pm nearly have a new server (fwd)
At Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:45:09 + (GMT), Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote: OK Groovers, The DNS has been set up so now london.pm.org is penderel.state51.co.uk as outlined below. The only problem with this is that the http server doesnt appear to be running at the moment and there is no-one alive on #london.pm who has a login - could someone who can kick the server into life and check the content is up to date. Strictly speaking, that isn't the _only_ problem :) The version of the website is at least a month out of date and the last time I looked the webserver on Penderel was set up differently to the hfb one. In order to get it working, one of two things need to happen. Either the Apache configuration needs to change so that .cgi files in any directory are executed (this is how hfb worked) or I need write access to the cgi-bin directory. As a short term-fix, just getting the pages from hfb would work - I could fix up the SSI and CGI stuff later. Cheers, Dave... [who would help more if it wasn't for this fscking firewall]
Re: London.pm nearly have a new server (fwd)
At Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:57:56 + (GMT), Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Dave Cross wrote: At Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:45:09 + (GMT), Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote: OK Groovers, The DNS has been set up so now london.pm.org is penderel.state51.co.uk as outlined below. The only problem with this is that the http server doesnt appear to be running at the moment and there is no-one alive on #london.pm who has a login - could someone who can kick the server into life and check the content is up to date. Strictly speaking, that isn't the _only_ problem :) The version of the website is at least a month out of date and the last time I looked the webserver on Penderel was set up differently to the hfb one. In order to get it working, one of two things need to happen. Either the Apache configuration needs to change so that .cgi files in any directory are executed (this is how hfb worked) or I need write access to the cgi-bin directory. We'll get the first person to turn up in the channel who has root to fix this :) If you need the password for the login on hfb, just SMS me on 07973 553385 and I'll send it right back. Dave...
Re: London.pm nearly have a new server (fwd)
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 09:23:38AM +, Jonathan Stowe wrote: OK Groovers, The DNS has been set up so now london.pm.org is penderel.state51.co.uk as outlined below. Does anyone have any feelings to delegating the DNS to servers under our own control at some juncture ? /me volunteers. I appear not to have fscked up djbdns on my box. I did, of course, test it with Someone Elses Domain :-) Haven't figured out how to do zone transfers yet, but I'm sure it can't be difficult. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/ Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced
RE: London.pm nearly have a new server (fwd)
Title: RE: London.pm nearly have a new server (fwd) -Original Message- From: Roger Burton West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: London.pm nearly have a new server (fwd) On or about Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 09:23:38AM +, Jonathan Stowe typed: Does anyone have any feelings to delegating the DNS to servers under our own control at some juncture ? I'll be happy to provide secondary - box is in Mailbox's Fulham location. See also soa.granitecanyon.com. Roger I can provide another secondary, if needed... ns.kieser.net (possibly) or ns.3drevolution.net (definitely). Also not a bad hand at setting up DNS servers :-) Mike
Re: London.pm nearly have a new server (fwd)
Roger Burton West wrote: On or about Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 09:23:38AM +, Jonathan Stowe typed: Does anyone have any feelings to delegating the DNS to servers under our own control at some juncture ? I'll be happy to provide secondary - box is in Mailbox's Fulham location. See also soa.granitecanyon.com. Granitecanyon? The boxes that are chronically down? Which resulted in me getting mail from the domain registry telling me to get a working nameserver up with thein week or they might yank the domain? Where noone seems to care about support. Granitecanyon -- where You Get What You Pay For. IMO, at least. Cheers, Philip (What use is a place where you can put anything you like in your zone files if the things are down half the time?)
Re: London.pm nearly have a new server (fwd)
On or about Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 02:11:41PM +0100, Philip Newton typed: Granitecanyon? The boxes that are chronically down? Which resulted in me getting mail from the domain registry telling me to get a working nameserver up with thein week or they might yank the domain? Where noone seems to care about support. I haven't had any problems with them, but I don't use them as primaries. Granitecanyon -- where You Get What You Pay For. IMO, at least. What you get is redundancy in the DNS. If they're down, so what? Roger
