Nicholas Clark schreef:
> Anyway, something's just gone horribly wrong because we[1]'ve just
> won a cricket match. That's not supposed to happen.
>
> 1: For some value of we that feels some sort of support for the
>England team, not that they really earn it that often.
>(Strict pedants wil
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:17:06PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Andy Wardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Nigel Hamilton wrote:
> >> Talking about inventing deities ... was anyone around when the GOD
> >> 'Kibo' was invented on Usenet?
> >
> > Yep. I've met and partied with Kibo himself. I
James Campbell wrote:
Hi everybody
I'm looking for a company to host a business website. Has anyone had any
good or bad experiences that they can comment on without an ensuing
lawsuite? I'm in London as I am sure (some) of you are so if you know of
any London based companies I would love to hear a
Does anyone know of a Perl guy in London called Tony Haggerty?
He doesn't owe me any money or anything, I just lost his e-mail.
Cheers
James
James Campbell wrote:
> I'm looking for a company to host a business website. Has anyone had
> any good or bad experiences that they can comment on without an
> ensuing lawsuite? I'm in London as I am sure (some) of you are so if
> you know of any London based companies I would love to hear about
>
On 2003.09.08 05:15 Kate L Pugh wrote:
I want to find a nice, visual, automatic way of looking at my modules'
dependencies. I want a script that I can give the name of a module
and optionally a Perl version, and get a recursive list of its
dependencies and their dependencies, maybe with highlighti
Hi everybody
I'm looking for a company to host a business website. Has anyone had any
good or bad experiences that they can comment on without an ensuing
lawsuite? I'm in London as I am sure (some) of you are so if you know of
any London based companies I would love to hear about them.
Before I m
Tony Bowden sent the following bits through the ether:
> Obviously depends on Module::CPANTS being correct, but that's an
> SEP...
I've given up Module::CPANTS to Thomas Klausner. So it's not my P! ;-)
May he run with it and do all the things I would do if I didn't have
seventeen billion and fou
Jason Clifford wrote:
[...]
You may safely reject any SMTP connection that announces itself this
way (HELO compuserve.com)
Just be sure you only match on "compuserve.com" as if you match subdomains
you'll be blocking email from a lot of people.
Yes, exactly that. In postfix, one would create a
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> Je 2003-09-08 15:29:16 +0100, Shevek skribis:
> > I like the suggestion later in this thread about having a standard way of
> > specifying "optional" modules. I think that such a feature could benefit
> > from considerable architecture support, and would
Je 2003-09-08 15:29:16 +0100, Shevek skribis:
> I like the suggestion later in this thread about having a standard way of
> specifying "optional" modules. I think that such a feature could benefit
> from considerable architecture support, and would make Makefile.PL (or
> whatever equivalent) more r
On Mon 08 Sep 2003, Shevek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the suggestion later in this thread about having a standard way of
> specifying "optional" modules. I think that such a feature could benefit
> from considerable architecture support, and would make Makefile.PL (or
> whatever equivalent
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Kate L Pugh wrote:
> Shevek wrote:
> >> Surely identifying the dependencies of any one module is incomputable in
> >> general, and most likely incomputable in the specific cases of many
> >> popular modules, especially those with baroque plugin architectures.
>
> On Mon 08 S
On 8 Sep 2003 at 15:29, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> At 14:13 +0100 9/8/03, Michael Stevens wrote:
> >Probably you could get most of the data the experimental way - %INC will
> >list things loaded with do, require, or use (see perlvar), so you could
> >'use' each interesting module on its own and
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, David Landgren wrote:
> I hope you succeed in doing in your MTA of choice. If you can drop the
> connection before DATA, you can save a lot of bandwidth.
>
> You may safely reject any SMTP connection that announces itself this
> way (HELO compuserve.com)
Just be sure you on
Michael Stevens wrote:
>
> Probably you could get most of the data the experimental way - %INC will
> list things loaded with do, require, or use (see perlvar), so you could
> 'use' each interesting module on its own and monitor which files get
> loaded, and generate a suitable graph.
I think tha
Peter Sergeant wrote:
How would one do the ditching at SMTP time?
It would appear that any email from this company starts its transaction
with my mail-server with 'HELO compuserve.com'. I've seen an exim4
config-file snippet to block at this point[1] - I'm looking to do the same
with exim3...
I h
Shevek said:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
>
>> Shevek wrote:
>> >
>> > Surely identifying the dependencies of any one module is incomputable
>> in
>> > general, and most likely incomputable in the specific cases of many
>> > popular modules, especially those with baroque plugi
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> > No, it's definitely Willow - particularly in leather.
>
> What do you guys have about this leather thing ?
It's the great British passion - leather on willow.
Jason Clifford
--
UKFSN.ORG Finance Free Software while you surf the
At 14:13 +0100 9/8/03, Michael Stevens wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:24:07PM +0100, Shevek wrote:
Surely identifying the dependencies of any one module is incomputable in
general, and most likely incomputable in the specific cases of many
popular modules, especially those with baroque plugin
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:12:18PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> Jason Clifford wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Robin Berjon wrote:
> >
> > > > It's Willow.
> > >
> > > My oh my. To say I had been putting such an absurd notion on the back of the
> > > fact that they were rosbifs. You're ma
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:21:33PM +0100, Kate L Pugh wrote:
> Well, I was planning to rely on Module::CPANTS. I'd prefer an extant
> imperfect solution to an unimplementable perfect solution, or no solution.
I've used this in the past.
Obviously depends on Module::CPANTS being correct, but that
On Monday, September 8, 2003, 1:55:53 PM, Jason Clifford wrote:
JC> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Robin Berjon wrote:
>> > It's Willow.
>>
>> My oh my. To say I had been putting such an absurd notion on the back of the
>> fact that they were rosbifs. You're making me doubt if building that tunnel was
>>
Shevek wrote:
>> Surely identifying the dependencies of any one module is incomputable in
>> general, and most likely incomputable in the specific cases of many
>> popular modules, especially those with baroque plugin architectures.
On Mon 08 Sep 2003, Rafael Garcia-Suarez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Tony Kennick wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:14:40 +0100
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought traditional london.pm advocacy was whether Willow or Buffy was
on top.
Willow and Faith custard wrestling.
On the note of advocacy, it is part of life, the problem with the mail
wasn't that it
Jason Clifford wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Robin Berjon wrote:
>
> > > It's Willow.
> >
> > My oh my. To say I had been putting such an absurd notion on the back of the
> > fact that they were rosbifs. You're making me doubt if building that tunnel was
> > a good idea, maybe it was better off
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:14:40 +0100
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:58:57AM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> > Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > MTA Advocacy Zzzz
> >
> > What, you'd rather we talked about *cars* or something
On 08/09/2003 at 13:15 +0100, Kate L Pugh wrote:
I want to find a nice, visual, automatic way of looking at my modules'
dependencies. [snip]
I wonder how far a combination of Module::ScanDeps and
Module::CoreList and a bit of wrapper code would get you?
http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Module::Sca
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> Shevek wrote:
> >
> > Surely identifying the dependencies of any one module is incomputable in
> > general, and most likely incomputable in the specific cases of many
> > popular modules, especially those with baroque plugin architectures.
>
>
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Robin Berjon wrote:
> > It's Willow.
>
> My oh my. To say I had been putting such an absurd notion on the back of the
> fact that they were rosbifs. You're making me doubt if building that tunnel was
> a good idea, maybe it was better off as an island.
>
> Faith Faith Faith
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
I thought traditional london.pm advocacy was whether Willow or Buffy was
on top.
It's Willow.
My oh my. To say I had been putting such an absurd notion on the back of the
fact that they were rosbifs. You're making me doubt if building that tunnel w
Shevek wrote:
>
> Surely identifying the dependencies of any one module is incomputable in
> general, and most likely incomputable in the specific cases of many
> popular modules, especially those with baroque plugin architectures.
Of course that depends on whether you want to compute the depen
Shevek wrote:
Isn't PDF a stack machine language similar to PostScript? Therefore text
wrapping is your problem (and a very hard one at that, look at TeX).
Text wrapping is sometimes unpleasant, but I believe that AxPoint shows how it
can be done and the code can certainly be stolen.
Otherwise, I
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:58:57AM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> > Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > MTA Advocacy Zzzz
> >
> > What, you'd rather we talked about *cars* or something like that?
>
> I thought traditional london.pm advocac
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Kate L Pugh wrote:
> I want to find a nice, visual, automatic way of looking at my modules'
> dependencies. I want a script that I can give the name of a module
> and optionally a Perl version, and get a recursive list of its
> dependencies and their dependencies, maybe with h
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Mark Fowler wrote:
> Has anyone here got experience with altering PDF documents from Perl?
> Basically I want to take an existing document and add some text to it.
>
> I've had a play with PDF::Reuse, and that seems to be exactly what I want,
> but it doesn't do textwrapping (
I want to find a nice, visual, automatic way of looking at my modules'
dependencies. I want a script that I can give the name of a module
and optionally a Perl version, and get a recursive list of its
dependencies and their dependencies, maybe with highlighting to show
which modules have never bee
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:58:57AM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > MTA Advocacy Zzzz
>
> What, you'd rather we talked about *cars* or something like that?
I thought traditional london.pm advocacy was whether Willow or Buffy was
on t
Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Sam Vilain wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 10:58, Lusercop wrote;
>>
>> > how can it now be unsupported?". Just upgrade. It will make your
>> > life *so* much easier. (there are actually .debs of exim4 around
>> > if you want it
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Sam Vilain wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 10:58, Lusercop wrote;
>
> > how can it now be unsupported?". Just upgrade. It will make your
> > life *so* much easier. (there are actually .debs of exim4 around
> > if you want it to sit nicely with your package management).
>
> Y
On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 10:58, Lusercop wrote;
> how can it now be unsupported?". Just upgrade. It will make your
> life *so* much easier. (there are actually .debs of exim4 around
> if you want it to sit nicely with your package management).
Yes. Upgrade. To postfix.
--
Sam Vilain, [EMAIL P
Has anyone here got experience with altering PDF documents from Perl?
Basically I want to take an existing document and add some text to it.
I've had a play with PDF::Reuse, and that seems to be exactly what I want,
but it doesn't do textwrapping (or at least I can't see how to do text
wrapping wi
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:18:58AM +0100, Peter Sergeant wrote:
> > How would one do the ditching at SMTP time?
> It would appear that any email from this company starts its transaction
> with my mail-server with 'HELO compuserve.com'. I've seen an exim4
> config-file snippet to block at this point
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:12:49AM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> Rafael Garcia-Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth:
> *> - that circle of light behind the head of saints (what's the english
> *> word ?)
> Halo or nimbus :)
The difference being, IIRC, that a halo is a simple ring, a nimbus has
s
> How would one do the ditching at SMTP time?
It would appear that any email from this company starts its transaction
with my mail-server with 'HELO compuserve.com'. I've seen an exim4
config-file snippet to block at this point[1] - I'm looking to do the same
with exim3...
+Pete
[1] http://black
Rafael Garcia-Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth:
*> - that circle of light behind the head of saints (what's the english
*> word ?)
Halo or nimbus :)
e.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:05:39AM +0100, Shevek wrote:
> Since mail15 alway use exactly the same subject line, I use spamassassin
> to make sure that it's a real mail15 line, and then procmail to ditch any
> mails tagged as spam having that subject line.
>
> To be honest, you could probably jus
On Mon 08 Sep 2003, Scott McWhirter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the fact that the bottom bar wasn't manned pissed me off a little...
I'm sorry you were disappointed by this. I did know it would be the
case but forgot to mention it in the announcement. This isn't the
only pub we use that doesn't
Since mail15 alway use exactly the same subject line, I use spamassassin
to make sure that it's a real mail15 line, and then procmail to ditch any
mails tagged as spam having that subject line.
To be honest, you could probably just ditch by subject line alone.
S.
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Peter Serg
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:58:12AM +0100, Michael Stevens wrote:
> The problem with the beer was basically that they ran out of several
> kinds of the nicer beer - they ran out of bombardier fairly early, then
> something else (old speckled hen?) then by around 9:30ish they ran
> out of Young's Bit
I've recently been getting hammered by mail15.com performing a
dictionary attack on my mail server - my server accepts email to anyone
@clueball.com, and so I've been recieving several thousand piece of spam
a day advertising mail15.com.
This is obviously somewhat upsetting - it may get marked as
On 7 Sep 2003 at 21:17, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Ah. I've had mail from Kibo, but haven't actually met him.
I've had mail from Kibo, but I *think* it was an autoreply or form
letter of some sort, so it probably doesn't really count. (It was a
long time ago and I can't remember precisely.)
Cheers
Apparently my mail server was dead for three days...
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote before the week-end:
> Dan Brook wrote:
> >
> > use vars '%INC';
>
> useless use of "use vars" : the INC symbol is exempt from strict-vars
> errors. Or do you use a buggy version of perl that I don't know about ?
Jason Clifford wrote:
>
> Christianity is a derived form of Judaism. It teaches that there is one
> God and that's it.
Nope -- Christianity is a derived form of Zorostrianism, with a few
Judaic influences, since Jesus was Jew. Note that Judaism was itself
heavily influenced by Zorostrianism, es
Dan Brook wrote:
>
> use vars '%INC';
useless use of "use vars" : the INC symbol is exempt from strict-vars
errors. Or do you use a buggy version of perl that I don't know about ?
55 matches
Mail list logo
