On 05/10/2013 07:57 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Is there *anyone* at all on this list using sendmail in production to
the degree where it being an objective would be useful to them?
The last I've seen is at least 10 year old.
Simone
--
Simone Piccardi Truelite
On 05/10/2013 09:00 PM, Bryan J Smith wrote:
Posfix has been the default MTA since Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 6
circa 2010.
So, speaking as myself, I think Postfix plus the 'sendmail
compatibility' would be ideal in the next iteration of objectives and
exams.
I totally agree, cannot
Title: OSA mail template
Yes, we are still using good old sendmail. But if market share has
dropped to a minimal number it is best dropped. An LPI laureate
should be able to figure it out when he encounters a (rare) sendmail
shop. Even when is was not on the exam...
On 05/10/2013 07:57 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Is there *anyone* at all on this list using sendmail in production to
the degree where it being an objective would be useful to them?
Yes, I am. Configuring sendmail with m4 macros is a required
skillset here. This covers at least proper hostname,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Simone Piccardi picca...@truelite.itwrote:
The last I've seen is at least 10 year old.
RHEL5 was released just over 6 years ago in 2007, and used Sendmail by
default. Exim (Enhancement) and Postfix (General Availability) were fully
supported alternatives with
Hello,
Passing LPI 202 exam v3 in 2009, I was suprised there was at least 2
questions about sendmail (noted as basic knowledge in the program) and
maybe 1 about postfix.
Is sendmail still an important topic for LPI 202? If so, could we
clarify the need to know it in the program in coherence with
Éric Deschamps ha scritto:
Hello,
Passing LPI 202 exam v3 in 2009, I was suprised there was at least 2
questions about sendmail (noted as basic knowledge in the program) and
maybe 1 about postfix.
Is sendmail still an important topic for LPI 202? If so, could we
clarify the need to know it
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Éric Deschamps erd...@free.fr wrote:
Is sendmail still an important topic for LPI 202? If so, could we
clarify the need to know it in the program in coherence with the exam?
Could have to do with the fact that the sendmail command is mandated
by POSIX IIRC
G. Matthew Rice wrote:
Considering that sendmail in the wild appears to be down to 12% of
the MTAs out there and Postfix has grown to double that (according to
that E-Soft Inc survey from Jan 2012), I think it's time to dump the
sendmail configuration stuff (who likes it anyway?) in favour of
Anselm Lingnau said the following on 10.05.2013 19:31:
[...]
I think that would be an eminently sensible idea. If you do that I'll buy you
a beer in Berlin.
With Sendmail, there is no question of »liking« it. »Liking« Sendmail would
be
like »liking« chemotherapy: It is a good thing that
On 10/05/2013 19:39, Dimitrios Bogiatzoules wrote:
Anselm Lingnau said the following on 10.05.2013 19:31:
[...]
I think that would be an eminently sensible idea. If you do that I'll buy
you
a beer in Berlin.
With Sendmail, there is no question of »liking« it. »Liking« Sendmail would
be
Éric Deschamps wrote:
Le 10/05/2013 14:00, Alessandro Selli a écrit :
Éric Deschamps ha scritto:
Hello,
Passing LPI 202 exam v3 in 2009, I was suprised there was at least 2
questions about sendmail (noted as basic knowledge in the program) and
maybe 1 about postfix.
Is sendmail still an
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 10/05/2013 19:39, Dimitrios Bogiatzoules wrote:
Anselm Lingnau said the following on 10.05.2013 19:31:
[...]
I think that would be an eminently sensible idea.
I back this idea.
If you do that I'll buy you a beer in Berlin.
Let us know when this will happen!
Could have to do with the fact that the sendmail command is mandated
by POSIX IIRC and is thus a ubiquitous command.
... I think it's time to dump the sendmail configuration stuff
(who likes it anyway?) in favour of Postfix...plus the 'sendmail
compatibility' ...
Hey, BJS (or anyone,
Bryan J Smith wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Alessandro Selli
alessandrose...@linux.com mailto:alessandrose...@linux.com wrote:
Could be:
http://www.sendmail.com/sm/sentrion_appliances/sentrion_mpe/
«Sentrion Email Integration Platform
The Heart of all Sentrion
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Bryan J Smith b.j.sm...@ieee.org wrote:
Why does some page at Sendmail stating #4 Red Hat Linux, immediately an
indicator that Red Hat has a long established, commercial relationship?
Actually, that's not even the full point. I meant to have added ...
When
Bryan J Smith wrote:
I'm still not getting your point, not at all.
Never mind.
Have a good weekend.
--
Alessandro Selli
Tel: 340.839.73.05
http://alessandro.route-add.net, VOIP: sip:dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave PGP/GPG key: EC885A8B
___
17 matches
Mail list logo
