On 02/28/2012 04:49 PM, Marc Baudoin wrote:
Hi,
Topic 103 in exam 101 has those subtopics:
103.2: filters
103.4: redirections and pipes
103.5: processes
103.7: grep
It would be more logical to study grep before pipes because many
piped commands use grep. I believe it also should be
Marc Baudoin wrote:
It would be more logical to study grep before pipes because many
piped commands use grep. I believe it also should be better to
study filters after pipes because filters are useful with pipes.
Personally, I also study processes before pipes because ps makes
good examples
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Anselm Lingnau
anselm.lingnau+exam...@linupfront.de wrote:
Contrary to what many people, including the authors of various LPI prep books,
seem to think, the order in which topics are listed in the objectives is *not*
actually the one single officially-allowed
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com écrit :
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:49:17 +0100
Marc Baudoin mbaud...@linagora.com wrote:
Topic 103 in exam 101 has those subtopics:
103.2: filters
103.4: redirections and pipes
103.5: processes
103.7: grep
[...]
A more logical approach
I am a lurker as I don't do much active training any more.
And yes, I noticed that if is it possible to 'punch the numbers' student
confidence is higher.
When I wrote the Security+ book for CompTIA, the 'number punch' approach
was well received.
Learn, Earn
http://www.trcb.com/a/tcat.htm
It's
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:43:26 +0100
Marc Baudoin mbaud...@linagora.com wrote:
The point is, you are perfectly free to teach and/or study the
materials in any order that makes sense for you. LPI does not
dictate exactly how the training will advance, only that a graduate
should know the
alan.mckin...@gmail.com
To: lpi-examdev@lpi.org
Sent: Tue, Feb 28, 2012 17:12:14 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] Topic 103 has inappropriate subtopic order
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:43:26 +0100
Marc Baudoin mbaud...@linagora.com wrote:
The point is, you are perfectly free to teach and/or study
Marc Baudoin schrieb:
What's the point in having an order then (especially when it's
numbered)?
The numbering makes it easier to refer to individual objectives when
discussing them. As for the order, that sort-of falls out of having numbered
objectives, but the ordering should not be
Alan McKinnon ha scritto:
[...]
The objectives are the end result, the destination. Not the same thing
as the journey to get there.
Nicely said! :-)
--
Alessandro Selli
Tel: 340.839.73.05
http://alessandro.route-add.net, VOIP: sip:dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave PGP/GPG key: EC885A8B
