Re: LPRng: duplicate postings?

2004-07-01 Thread Patrick Powell
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 28 16:27:48 2004 From: Dave Lovelace [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LPRng: duplicate postings? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:43:20 -0400 (EDT) Am I the only one getting duplicate postings? This is the second copy of this one, and I got several

RE: LPRng: Experiences with printers

2004-07-01 Thread Sam Warren
I have been very pleased with Xerox N4525's. We have some really bad environments here in manufacturing and they are real work horses. Even in areas with large amounts of dirt (like our weld shop that is full of welding soot and our aluminum extrusion area that is full of graphite used in the

Re: LPRng: LPRng mailing list under SPAM attack

2004-07-01 Thread Patrick Powell
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 13:40:07 2004 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:15:37 +0200 From: Willi Burmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LPRng: LPRng mailing list under SPAM attack Hi Patrick, Well, apparently the Spammers have caught on to this type of thing.

Re: LPRng: CUPS - LPRng Gateway ?

2004-07-01 Thread Patrick Powell
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 13:40:08 2004 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:23:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LPRng: CUPS - LPRng Gateway ? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I've checked with Maplesoft.com and it's true that current and probably future versions of

Re: LPRng: Experiences with printers

2004-07-01 Thread Jochen Eggemann
This question came up about a year ago and someone recommended the Xerox Phasers. We followed this advice and are very happy with our Xerox Phaser 6250DT. It's fast, comes with true postscript, builtin duplex, appsocket, and the black toner is very cheap. Oh, by the way, we switched from a