[lsc-dev] [LDAP Synchronization Connector - Bug #885] (New) Broken repositories in pom.xml : shut down/changed behaviour

2017-01-18 Thread noreply
Issue #885 has been reported by Soisik Froger. Bug #885: Broken repositories in pom.xml : shut down/changed behaviour http://tools.lsc-project.org/issues/885 Author: Soisik Froger Status: New Priority: Normal Assigned to: Category: Target version: 2.2

[lsc-dev] [LDAP Synchronization Connector - Bug #886] (New) Quick start tutorial not working with Java 8

2017-01-18 Thread noreply
Issue #886 has been reported by Soisik Froger. Bug #886: Quick start tutorial not working with Java 8 http://tools.lsc-project.org/issues/886 Author: Soisik Froger Status: New Priority: Normal Assigned to: Category: Target version: Problem in version:

[lsc-dev] [LDAP Synchronization Connector - Bug #886] Quick start tutorial not working with Java 8

2017-01-18 Thread noreply
Issue #886 has been updated by Clément OUDOT. Category set to Sample Target version set to 2.1.4 Bug #886: Quick start tutorial not working with Java 8 http://tools.lsc-project.org/issues/886 Author: Soisik Froger Status: New Priority: Normal Assigned

Re: [lsc-dev] Vote for a new LSC commiter

2017-01-18 Thread Soisik Froger
Hi Raphaël, I've created a couple of bug reports with patches attached : 885 Broken repositories in pom.xml : shut down/changed behaviour http://tools.lsc-project.org/issues/885 886 Quick start tutorial not working with Java 8 http://tools.lsc-project.org/issues/886 I've got

[lsc-dev] [LDAP Synchronization Connector - Bug #887] (New) JS array are not properly converted to java list in java 8

2017-01-18 Thread noreply
Issue #887 has been reported by Soisik Froger. Bug #887: JS array are not properly converted to java list in java 8 http://tools.lsc-project.org/issues/887 Author: Soisik Froger Status: New Priority: Normal Assigned to: Category: Core Target version:

Re: [lsc-dev] Vote for a new LSC commiter

2017-01-18 Thread Sébastien Bahloul
Hi Soisik, Because Java 6 & 7 are deprecated, breaking compatibility with Java 6 to add compatibility to Java 8 seems acceptable to me. And from my perspective, I am ok and happy to welcome you as LSC commiter :) Regards, Sebastien BAHLOUL 2017-01-18 15:30 GMT+01:00 Soisik Froger