Hi Huaimo
Thinking about physical topology a little further as with the FT algorithm
it makes sense to decouple the FT from the physical however the overall
coverage is based on those basic parameters of degree number of links and
nodes as well as width and depth of the topology.
Thinking about
Hi Gyan,
> I think with clos spine leaf the mesh is much more intensive and problematic
> with ECMP then a circular topology nodal mesh that results in duplicate
> redundant flooding that slows down convergence. With spine leaf it’s like an
> X horizontal width axis and then depth is spine
Hi Huaimo
Thank you for the slide deck. That really helps understand the algorithm.
I will let you know if I have any questions.
The goal of the algorithm is to speed up convergence by limiting the
convergence scope and expanding out 1 link at a time until all nodes and
links are part of the
On May 21, 2020 at 3:39:03 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
> With respect to Alvaro's clarification, your answer for (1) makes sense;
> thanks! I think Alvaro has offered to help work out what (if any)
> additional text we might want to be sure that the answer to (2) is clear in
> the
Hi Gyan,
Thanks much for your suggestion.
Gyan> It maybe a good idea for both documents to reference each other as to
how they play together or in some respects if any provide a homogeneous
complete holistic solution for flooding problem being solved.
[HC]: I will add the reference
