Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

2020-06-19 Thread Loa Andersson
Working Group, I support the adoption of this document. /Loa On 11/06/2020 03:28, Christian Hopps wrote: This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection The draft would be adopted on the Experimental tra

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

2020-06-19 Thread Tony Przygienda
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:43 PM John Scudder wrote: > Hi All, > > I just did a full read-through of -01. Without denigrating any other > solutions, I support adoption of this one. > > I do have a few comments and nits, below. > > - Paragraph 2 of section 9 is unclear, IMO; I hope this can be imp

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

2020-06-19 Thread John Scudder
Hi All, I just did a full read-through of -01. Without denigrating any other solutions, I support adoption of this one. I do have a few comments and nits, below. - Paragraph 2 of section 9 is unclear, IMO; I hope this can be improved in the next version. It reads exactly like a protocol expert

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-01

2020-06-19 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Alvaro - I will publish an update once we have converged on all your comments. Responses inline. > -Original Message- > From: Alvaro Retana > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 1:05 PM > To: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-...@ietf.org > Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@iet