Hi Matthew,
Thanks for your RTG directorate review!!! These can be included in the WG last
call comment revisions. I had suggested the exact same change for "to be
diverted".
Hi Co-authors,
Please include the nits below.
Thanks,
Acee
On 4/27/22, 11:46 AM, "Matthew Bocci via Datatracker"
Hi -
I think you've just made the argument for taking no action at all.
I do think that argument is more persuasive than the ones advanced so
far for changing deployed typedefs, and think the "no action" proposal
would be a reasonable compromise.
Randy
On 2022-04-27 4:51 AM, Christian Hopps wro
Reviewer: Matthew Bocci
Review result: Ready
The draft is basically ready. I found the it easy to read and well written.
Thank you!
I have a few minor nits, intended to improve readability, as follows:
Section 2.2:
"..to a bunch of routers R1 thru RN..." I suggest changing 'thru' to 'through',
t
Speaking as someone who at one point worked for an operator trying to use YANG to actuall
configure a large network (services and devices), and also having interacted with the
openconfig folks over the years. I find your perspective, if I understand it, that being
too "loose" with things will
