[Lsr] lsr - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 115

A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Christian Hopps, a Chair of the lsr working group. - Working Group Name: Link State Routing Area Name: Routing Area Session Requester: Christian Hopps Number of Sessions: 1

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1239131] expert review for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis (isis-tlv-codepoints)

"Sabrina Tanamal via RT" writes: Chris and Hannes (cc: lsr WG), Reviewed new addition, looks OK. Thanks, Chris. As the designated experts for the Sub-TLVs for TLVs Advertising Neighbor Information registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis

[Lsr] [Errata Verified] RFC2328 (7112)

The following errata report has been verified for RFC2328, "OSPF Version 2". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7112 -- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Renato

Re: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2328 (7112)

Agreed. This is clearly documented section 10.6 on page 100. Thanks, Acee On 9/1/22, 4:52 PM, "Lsr on behalf of John Scudder" wrote: This looks right. If there are any objections to verifying it, please let me know. —John > On Sep 1, 2022, at 2:39 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:

Re: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2328 (7112)

This looks right. If there are any objections to verifying it, please let me know. —John > On Sep 1, 2022, at 2:39 PM, RFC Errata System > wrote: > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328, > "OSPF Version 2". > > -- > You may

Re: [Lsr] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-03

Menachem - V4 of the draft has been uploaded which addresses your comments as described in my earlier responses. Please let me know if there are any remaining issues. Thanx. Les > -Original Message- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 9:53 AM > To:

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-04.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : IS-IS Extensions in Support of Inter-Autonomous System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering Authors :

[Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2328 (7112)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328, "OSPF Version 2". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7112 -- Type: Editorial Reported by: Renato Westphal Section:

[Lsr] ietf-o...@2019-10-17.yang: questions

Hi all, I have a few questions about the OSPF YANG module. I apologize if some of these questions were already asked before, but I couldn't find anything in the mailing list archives. I also listed a few improvement suggestions, but I'm not sure if the draft can be updated at this point (it's

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-05

Hi Ketan, Thanks for the prompt update. I have one question about your edits. In Section 6, I had suggested OLD: Implementations MAY provide a local configuration option to specifically enable BFD operation in OSPF BFD strict-mode only. NEW (my suggestion): Implementations MAY

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-05

Hi John, Thanks for your detailed review and comments/suggestions. We've accepted your editorial changes and please check inline for responses to your comments. We have also posted the updated version with these changes:

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-06.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : OSPF BFD Strict-Mode Authors : Ketan Talaulikar Peter Psenak

[Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-04

Dear Authors, Thanks for this short, clean, document. I have no nits (!!) and only one substantive comment to discuss. In Figures 2 and 3, you annotate all the sub-TLVs from the relevant OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 registries, to indicate whether those sub-TLVs are, or are not, applicable in the