[Lsr] Re: Working Group Last Call for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-07

2024-05-16 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Acee - As regards my comments, Shraddha is correct. I explicitly stated this back on April 26: Acee – I left it up to Shraddha to introduce the I-bit or not – she has chosen not to do so. I believe all of my comments have been addressed to my satisfaction – sorry if it appeared that I left

[Lsr] Re: Working Group Last Call for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-07

2024-05-16 Thread Shraddha Hegde
Hi Ketan, Snipping to open points 2) This comment is specific to OSPF given the encoding differences it has with ISIS. Section 2.2 allows for Generic Metric TLV to be used in too many places without clear specification of what it is used for - this is a potential pitfall for interop issues.

[Lsr] Re: Working Group Last Call for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-07

2024-05-16 Thread Shraddha Hegde
Acee, I believe Les and I have agreed to the text that I added and his comments are closed. Les, let me know if you don't agree. I don't agree with Ketan's comment on removing code points from OSPF TE opaque LSAs. Early code points are already taken and implementations underway. If he can