Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03

on, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:43 PM Tarek Saad mailto:ts...@juniper.net>> wrote: Hi authors, My understanding is the draft is proposing a separate MT topology (unique MT-ID) to identify a forwarding treatment to be enforced on a shared resource. While this may work for limited number of MT topolog

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03

Hi authors, My understanding is the draft is proposing a separate MT topology (unique MT-ID) to identify a forwarding treatment to be enforced on a shared resource. While this may work for limited number of MT topologies (i.e. forwarding treatments), as described in RF5120 there is overhead

Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints

.@ietf.org> on behalf of tony...@tony.li<mailto:tony...@tony.li>> wrote: Hi Tarek, Please recall that in FA there is no path setup. If the delay changes and it propagates to other nodes, then the network will SPF and paths may change immediately. Tony On Mar 3, 2021, at 2:34 PM,

Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints

Hi Robert, The RSVP-TE world has had to deal with such churn resulting from frequent link attribute changes (e.g. specific to available BW). In that case, such frequent changes made their way to the network at periodic intervals and in the event they crossed a threshold. In my mind, the link

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

I read this draft and I support its adoption. Regards, Tarek > On Dec 1, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) > > wrote: > > This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases > and deployment prior to IETF 109 and there

[Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

I am aware of an IPR that applies to this. Its disclosure is being worked on -- in conformance with IETF rules. Regards, Tarek Juniper Business Use Only From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 4:21 PM To:

Re: [Lsr] [spring] IETF 106 - SPRING agenda

initial thoughts on the proposal. Regards, Tarek From: Robert Raszuk Date: Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 4:52 AM To: Tarek Saad Cc: SPRING WG List , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [spring] IETF 106 - SPRING agenda > Once advertised in the network using a suitable link s