.
Thanks,
Acee
From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 8:25 AM
To: "lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix
Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
This begins a tw
;>
>> I say again, this draft in its current form is not ready to be adopted.
>>
>>
>>
>>Les
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Aijun Wang
>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 3:27 PM
>> To: John E Drake
>> Cc:
be adopted.
>
>Les
>
>
> From: Aijun Wang
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 3:27 PM
> To: John E Drake
> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lindem (acee)
> ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Pr
> *To:* John E Drake
> *Cc:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lindem (acee) <
> a...@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for
> Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
>
>
>
&g
Drake
Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lindem (acee)
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix
Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
Hi, John:
Thanks for your review and comments.
The use cases and origin
Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 8:22 AM
> To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix
> Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
>
> To the
Yes/support.
Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)
From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Acee
Lindem (acee)
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:26 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix
Or
Support.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Acee
Lindem (acee)
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:26 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix
Originator" - draf
I support.
- Naiming
From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Acee
Lindem (acee)
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 20:26
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix
Originator" - draf
I think we are in sync, i.e.
without this draft there is no use-case for node T1 to send an
AS-scoped router info LSA without being ASBR.
Please correct if you know of an existing use-case.
Thx,
Dirk
On 2/18/2019 15:01, Peter Psenak wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On 18/02/2019 14:47 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia -
On 18/02/2019 14:37 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
I agree with Peter.
For this to work, the ABR would need to add ALL originators, while I
had the impression that we only had 1 originator per prefix,
i.e. the originator which was found to be the closed to the ABR and
for which the
Hi Dirk,
On 18/02/2019 14:47 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
Hi Peter,
and you use these when you send a traffic to some of the prefixes that
T1 originates
If T1 is not ASBR, and this draft is not implemented, how are the nodes
in the
other area's going to know that the
Hi Peter,
and you use these when you send a traffic to some of the prefixes that T1
originates
If T1 is not ASBR, and this draft is not implemented, how are the nodes in the
other area's going to know that the prefixes belong to T1?
Dirk
On 2/18/2019 14:34, Peter Psenak wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On
I agree with Peter.
For this to work, the ABR would need to add ALL originators, while I
had the impression that we only had 1 originator per prefix,
i.e. the originator which was found to be the closed to the ABR and
for which the ABR installed a route.
Dirk
On 2/18/2019 14:15, Peter Psenak
Hi Dirk,
On 18/02/2019 14:27 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
Hi Peter,
See inline DG>.
Dirk
On 2/18/2019 14:18, Peter Psenak wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On 18/02/2019 09:31 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
support +1
1 question:
When S1 in another area receives such LSA, it
Hi Peter,
See inline DG>.
Dirk
On 2/18/2019 14:18, Peter Psenak wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On 18/02/2019 09:31 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
support +1
1 question:
When S1 in another area receives such LSA, it then can learn that
prefix Lt1 is associated with node T1, check the ELC,
;OSPF Extension for Prefix
Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
This begins a two week adoption poll for the subject draft. Please send your
comments to this list before 12:00 AM UTC on Thursday, February 28th, 2019.
All authors have responded to the IPR poll and th
Hi Dirk,
On 18/02/2019 09:31 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
support +1
1 question:
When S1 in another area receives such LSA, it then can learn that
prefix Lt1 is associated with node T1, check the ELC, ERLD, or MSD
value according to its necessity, and construct the
Support as coauthor, although I never really agreed with the usage of
the prefix originator for topology construction as described in section
3 and 5. I would prefer that part to be removed.
thanks,
Peter
On 13/02/2019 14:25 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
This begins a two week adoption poll
+1 for support.
Seems as a useful extension to have available in OSPF toolbox.
G/
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 20:26
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix
Originator" - draft-wan
support +1
1 question:
When S1 in another area receives such LSA, it then can learn that
prefix Lt1 is associated with node T1, check the ELC, ERLD, or MSD
value according to its necessity, and construct the right label stack
at the ingress node S1 for the traffic destined to Lt1.
How
This begins a two week adoption poll for the subject draft. Please send your
comments to this list before 12:00 AM UTC on Thursday, February 28th, 2019.
All authors have responded to the IPR poll and there is one
22 matches
Mail list logo
