@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-lin-lsr-flex-algo-metric-00
Hi Mengxiao,
please see inline:
On 25/03/2022 07:35, Chenmengxiao wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thank you for the comments.
>
> Time for the presentation is very limited. Glad to receive your comments
> her
Hi Peter,
Sorry to reply late. Please see inline.
Thanks,
Mengxiao Chen
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 4:16 PM
To: chenmengxiao (RD) ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-lin-lsr-flex-algo-metric-00
Hi Mengxiao
,
Mengxiao Chen
-Original Message-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 11:09 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] draft-lin-lsr-flex-algo-metric-00
Hi,
as I was unable to make my comments during the presentation, let me put
them
-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 11:09 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] draft-lin-lsr-flex-algo-metric-00
Hi,
as I was unable to make my comments during the presentation, let me put
them here:
When we started with the flex
Hi,
as I was unable to make my comments during the presentation, let me put
them here:
When we started with the flex-algo work, there has been a lengthy
discussion on why not to use the multi-topology (MT) instead. We always
wanted flex-algo to be light weight and as a result easy to
