Hi Randy,
Since BMP is promoted in GROW WG, the work has much similarity with BMP. So we
applied for the presentation here.
Best Regards,
Robin
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2018 2:46 AM
To: Acee Lindem (acee)
Cc: Lizhenbin ; g..
Apologies for the delay in responding. I am not personally aware of IPR related to draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-10 and Apple will continue to abide by RFC 8179.Thanks,-shaneOn Jun 18, 2018, at 4:31 PM, Christian Hopps wrote:Hi Authors,Can you please respond (including the mailing list) indicati
Robin,
Pretty much same comment as Acee - I'm not clear as to why...
Protocol YANG models developed in the last years clearly provide much better
and more scalable approach to what has been proposed in the draft, since we are
talking is-is - look at notifications in draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg
i am confused as why this is in grow. it's protocol.
randy
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Hi Robin,
I'm not arguing to deprecate BMP. What I am arguing is that the fact that BMP
was created 15 years ago doesn't necessarily mean we should create an analogous
IMP for IS-IS given the current IETF OPS technologies and the fact that faster
link speeds and Moore's law facilitate deploymen
Dear Acee Lindem,
The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request.
lsr Session 1 (2:30 requested)
Monday, 16 July 2018, Morning Session I 0930-1200
Room Name: Van Horne size: 130
Hi Acee,
Thank for your attention to the new draft. Please refer to my reply inline.
Best Regards,
Robin
-Original Message-
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 9:24 PM
To: Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dep
