Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

2019-08-28 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Acee, I agree with your statement. We (MSD DE’s) have OKed temporary allocation. I believe WGLC would be in place. Regards, Jeff > On Aug 28, 2019, at 14:30, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > Hi Uma, > > The draft states that an explicit ERLD is required. I’m not a forwarding ASIC > expert so

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

2019-08-28 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Uma, The draft states that an explicit ERLD is required. I’m not a forwarding ASIC expert so I can’t envision all the trade-offs but I certainly don’t see much risk in continuing with the ERLD as this has been in the drafts for some time. All, I’d like to Working Group Last Call these

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

2019-08-28 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Les, Then what you meant in your response was, “generic RLD” as opposed to “generic MSD”. Thanks, Acee From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 4:46 PM To: Acee Lindem , Uma Chunduri , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07 Acee – I do

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

2019-08-28 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Les, I think the question is whether there can be a single RLD depth MSD rather than a RLD solely for entropy label discovery. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 4:29 PM To: Uma Chunduri , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Lsr]

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

2019-08-28 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Uma - Please read https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12#section-4 In short, we do not assume that EL Load Balancing can be performed for generic MSD. Thanx. Les From: Lsr On Behalf Of Uma Chunduri Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 11:38 AM To: lsr@ietf.org

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

2019-08-28 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
I know we decided we needed different types of MSD but you’re questioning whether we really need different types of RLD. Forwarding implementors? Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Uma Chunduri Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 2:38 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr]

[Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

2019-08-28 Thread Uma Chunduri
Can anybody tell what was the conclusion (if any) in previous discussions in various WGs on why the readable label depth in an LSR has to be entropy label specific ? IOW can we just modify this as "readable label depth" as opposed to "entropy readable label depth" ? This would allow any other

[Lsr] FW: IPR Disclosure Juniper's Statement about IPR related to draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed

2019-08-28 Thread bruno.decraene
FYI -Original Message- From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-...@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 8:37 PM To: draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-sp...@ietf.org Cc: ipr-annou...@ietf.org Subject: IPR Disclosure Juniper's Statement about IPR related to