Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-te-app-13

Bruno - Thanx again for your review. V14 of the draft has been posted to address your comments. Please let me know if you believe there are still outstanding issues. A few more remarks inline. > -Original Message- > From: bruno.decra...@orange.com > Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 9:33

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 IPR Poll

I’ve received IPR responses from all the authors but Dean Cheng. Please respond. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" Date: Friday, May 15, 2020 at 3:48 PM To: "draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduct...@ietf.org" Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation

[Lsr] Request for Working Group Adoption: Area Proxy

Dear Gentlebeings, I would like to formally request working group adoption of “Area Proxy for IS-IS” (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03 ). The goal of this work is to improve scalability of IS-IS when

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-te-app-14.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : IS-IS TE Attributes per application Authors : Les Ginsberg Peter Psenak

Re: [Lsr] Request for Working Group Adoption: Area Proxy

support. On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:42 AM wrote: > > Dear Gentlebeings, > > I would like to formally request working group adoption of “Area Proxy for > IS-IS” (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03). > > The goal of this work is to improve scalability of IS-IS when transit

Re: [Lsr] Request for Working Group Adoption: Area Proxy

support Sent from my iPhone > On 04.06.2020, at 18:43, tony...@tony.li wrote: > >  > > Dear Gentlebeings, > > I would like to formally request working group adoption of “Area Proxy for > IS-IS” (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03). > > The goal of this work is to

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

Folks - Replying to the WG list on this as we believe this is of interest to the entire WG. The designated experts (Chris, Hannes, and myself) have discussed the request for early codepoint allocations for draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04. Ordinarily such requests are routine. Our task is only

Re: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Support to adopt draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 as WG item. Best, Yiu From: Lsr on behalf of Tony Przygienda Date: Thursday, June 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 I

Re: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

yes/support Cheers, Jeff On Jun 4, 2020, 11:05 AM -0700, Tony Przygienda , wrote: > I would like to officially call out for adoption of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 as WG > document > > At this point in time flood reflection has been implemented and

[Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

We support the adoption of draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection. Thanks, Alankar ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

I support WG adoption of draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection. Chris On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:05 PM Tony Przygienda wrote: > I would like to officially call out for adoption of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 as > WG document > > At this point in time

Re: [Lsr] Request for Working Group Adoption: Area Proxy

Since stuff seems to develop its own dynamics obviously I will start another thread for official adoption by WG for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 in this thread as well. Further comments below On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:43 AM wrote: > > ... > > In IS-IS

[Lsr] WG Document Adoption Call

Note that it is appropriate for draft authors to request a WG adoption call. However, the actual adoption call needs to be done by the WG chairs and that is when support/objection is requested. Thanks, Acee ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org

[Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

I would like to officially call out for adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 as WG document At this point in time flood reflection has been implemented and works meeting use case requirements of multiple customers which neither TTZ nor draft-proxy is

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt

Hi Peter, Thanks. Please see inline . -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 4:53 PM To: wangyali ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt Yali, please see inline: On 04/06/2020 05:09,

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-te-app-13

Jouni - Just to let you know that V14 of the draft was posted today and it includes all of the corrections you requested. Thanx again for your review. Les > -Original Message- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 8:02 AM > To: Jouni Korhonen ;

[Lsr] Change of email address

Dear colleagues, Following the acquisition of my employer - ECI Telecom, by Ribbon, starting from 09-Jun-20 all the mails I will send to IETF will use alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com as my address. I will still be receiving emails addressed to