Re: [Lsr] LSR WG IPR Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz.txt

2020-08-26 Thread Toy, Mehmet
I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to draft-chen-isis-ttz. Thanks Mehmet --- *From:* Acee Lindem (acee) *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:24 AM *To:* draft-chen-isis-...@ietf.org *Cc:* lsr@ietf.org *Subject:* LSR WG IPR Poll for

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt

2020-08-26 Thread tony . li
Les, > As per the draft: > > Area Proxy TLV is advertised by IERs in their L2 LSP. > Area Proxy TLV is NOT advertised in the Proxy LSP. > So how do the OERs become aware of the > > “prefix and SID that represents the entirety of the Inside Area to the > Outside Area” > > ??? > > I

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt

2020-08-26 Thread tony . li
Hi Les, > You have chosen to assign a prefix as the “Area Destination”. Are you sure you have the right document? The word “Destination” does not appear anywhere within https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03

Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt

2020-08-26 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Tony - You have chosen to assign a prefix as the "Area Destination". This is fine with me. But having done that, forwarding should be based on the existing mechanisms for advertising a prefix and the associated prefix SID. By doing that you avoid a number of problems: * Duplicate SID

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt

2020-08-26 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Tony – Sigh… I introduced the term “Area Destination” only as a means of demonstrating that this could have been something other than a prefix – as had been proposed in earlier versions of the draft. I am not asking you to introduce the term in the draft and as it seemed to confuse you I

Re: [Lsr] Remind Reply: LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt

2020-08-26 Thread Ning So
As Co-Author, I support working group adoption of this draft as experimental. Ning So -- > *From:* Lsr on behalf of Anil Kumar < > anil.i...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, August 22, 2020 2:10 PM > *To:* Acee Lindem (acee) > *Cc:* lsr@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re:

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt

2020-08-26 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Tony – Inline. From: Tony Li On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 5:40 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt Les, As per the draft: Area Proxy TLV is advertised by IERs in their L2 LSP.

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt

2020-08-26 Thread tony . li
Hi Les, > [Les:] Any one of the IERs can be elected Area Leader, therefore all of them > have to be configured with the Area Prefix and associated SID. The Area Leader may not be an IER. In fact, in an important use case for us, the area is a leaf-spine topology. The Area Leader is one of