Hi Acee,
Yes. I asked them to check the consistency with the IPR claims of SRV6 ISIS and
if necessary disclose as the IETF rules.
Best Regards,
Robin
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com
发件人：Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi All,
I support to publish the draft as the co-author. It has been stable and well
written.
Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com
发件人：Acee Lindem (acee)
收件人：lsr
抄
Hi Shraddha and Les,
Sorry for late reply and thanks for your comments.
Yes, the maximum link metric mechanism is an option as described in section 4
of the draft.
But, it has two defects which we also wanted to discuss in ietf 114 meeting.
Firstly, it restricts the
Speaking as WG member:
I support publication of this draft. I reviewed the draft and my comments have
been incorporated.
Thanks,
Acee
From: Lsr on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)"
Date: Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:18 PM
To: lsr
Cc: "draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org"
Subject:
Hi Everyone,
I read through the document and support its publication.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
From: Lsr on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)"
Date: Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:18 PM
To: lsr
Cc: "draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org"
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for
Hi All,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks,
Zhenbin (Robin)
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com
发件人：Acee Lindem (acee)
收件人：Lizhenbin
抄 送：lsr ;draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6
Support.
This matches the IS-IS SRv6 extensions, and it is ready to publish.
Sue
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Dongjie (Jimmy)
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 11:22 AM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for
I support publication of this specification for the SRV6 OSPFV3 extension
as the SRV6 ISIS extension is in RFC queue.
Do we have any implementations of this OSPFv3 extension?
Thanks
Gyan
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 1:17 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this
Liyan –
You agree that there is an existing way to prune links from the IGP SPF.
Still, you insist that an extension that requires ALL routers – whether they
support flex algo or not – to utilize a new advertisement when computing algo 0
SPF is necessary.
Your rationale for this is that this
Speaking as WG member:
I agree with Les. A non-backward compatible change is a non-starter.
I’m not sure why you’d need to present this again at the Interim unless you
provide backward compatibility.
Thanks,
Acee
From: Lsr on behalf of "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"
Date: Friday, August 12,
+1 Cheers,Jeff From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 9:05 AMTo: 龚立艳; lsr@ietf.org; shraddhaSubject: Re: [Lsr] Comments ondraft-gong-lsr-exclusive-link-for-flex-algo Liyan – You agree that there is an existing way to prune links from the IGP SPF.Still, you insist that an
11 matches
Mail list logo
