A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology
Authors : Naiming Shen
Les Ginsberg
I think my email is being taken way too seriously. Please note it was "an aside"
Also I feel the need to defend Christian's code here. Did you check the code
prior to the comments? I don't see a lot of obfuscation, in fact I see code for
printing data for user consumption (e.g., id2str, etc),
Somewhat Apple & Kiwi comparisons all over the place here a bit IMO.
Assuming we seem to be talking about ROTH in IP fabrics mainly ...
a) Babel was solving wireless mesh problem, extremely different from wired
fabrics and Babel as solution was IMO fully justified and superior to
suggested ISIS
FWIW, this use of IS-IS was not adopted by homenet, which is why we now have
babel wg.
Thanks,
Chris.
Acee Lindem (acee) writes:
On 3/8/19, 7:22 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" wrote:
tony...@tony.li writes:
>Robert Raszuk writes:
>>
>> See TORs are one case ..
Well I was actually not talking about homenet efforts, but any small/mid
size compute clusters.
See today it is very common for hosts to participate in dynamic routing -
simply due to a fact that VMs or PODs want to be dynamically IP reachable
when they are created by orchestration.
Moreover it
On 3/8/19, 7:22 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" wrote:
tony...@tony.li writes:
>Robert Raszuk writes:
>>
>> See TORs are one case .. but there are ideas to run dynamic protocols to
the hosts too. I have heard there was even a volunteer to write ISIS-lite to be
tony...@tony.li writes:
Robert Raszuk writes:
See TORs are one case .. but there are ideas to run dynamic protocols to the
hosts too. I have heard there was even a volunteer to write ISIS-lite to be
used on hosts :)
I would…. discourage that concept.
Perhaps Robert is referring to when
