§4
The presence of a TLV (or sub-TLV) with content which does not
conform to the relevant specification MUST NOT cause the LSP itself
to be rejected.
Again, thank you for your effort to clarify the specification.
Given the "MUST", I feel that this sentence may be read as contradicting wi
Hi all,
To be clear, I support that document. Thanks for writing it.
I have some comments, mostly asking for even more of this/such document.
(although I expect that some comments will trigger a discussion ;-) )
§3.1
"Any codes in a received PDU that are not recognised shall be
ignored."
