Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, On 8/20/19, 11:52 AM, "Mirja Kuehlewind" wrote: Hi Acee, Thanks for these changes/additions. One comment below. > On 20. Aug 2019, at 17:05, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > Hi Mirja, > > On 8/19/19, 12:25 PM, "Mirja Kühlewind via

Re: [Lsr] Solicit feedback on draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-01

Hi Qin, I didn't see any response to this email, so I thought I should chip in with some (old, old, old) memories and context. tl;dr I am generally supportive of this work, but I think a little fine-tuning is needed. If I recall correctly, the situation when 5088 and 5089 were produced was that

Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)

Hi Acee, Thanks for these changes/additions. One comment below. > On 20. Aug 2019, at 17:05, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > Hi Mirja, > > On 8/19/19, 12:25 PM, "Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker" > wrote: > >Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for >

Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, On 8/19/19, 12:25 PM, "Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker" wrote: Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in