On January 10, 2020 at 10:53:40 AM, Les Ginsberg wrote:
Les:
Hi!
> We are working on addressing your comments - but it will take us a bit of
> time to complete that - please be patient.
You have all been very patient with me already -- I can only return
the favor. :-)
> One question. In
On January 9, 2020 at 7:53:17 PM, Marcelo Bustani wrote:
Marcelo:
Olá!
> My intention was to mitigate a possible misunderstanding or a multiple
> different interpretations, that I guess it is happening with Cisco and
> Juniper; both are not wrong depending from the section they are based on.
Hi Robert,
> I agree with you that essentially this is a link property (hence my earlier
> hint towards 5029) so it makes it at least two of us recommending direction
> towards 5029 now ;)
Is that rough consensus? ;-)
> While we are at this perhaps it would be also useful to be able to
>
Alvaro -
Happy New Year to you!
Thanx for the extensive review of this draft and
draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-10.
It is clear that you spent a good deal of time on this and covered a lot of
ground - much appreciated.
We are working on addressing your comments - but it will take us a
Hi Tony,
I agree with you that essentially this is a link property (hence my earlier
hint towards 5029) so it makes it at least two of us recommending direction
towards 5029 now ;)
While we are at this perhaps it would be also useful to be able to
differentiate reachability on stub links vs
