Hi Wang,
You are correct. Though I wouldn't call it a goal but rather a
benefit/advantage - same applies to SR-MPLS where the label stack can be
reduced.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
Sent: 08 May 2020 19:07
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] draft-ietf-ls
Hi Tony, Sarah
Thank you for your work about Flooding Reduction mechanism. I think it is very
useful for IGP scalability.
When Sarah giving presentation for draft-chen-lsr-dynamic-flooding-algorithm-00
in LSR interim meeting, I raised a question about how to handle multipoint
failure in the flo
Hi authors:
After reading through this draft lsr-flex-algo, I want to know whether there is
a potential goal of this draft to reduce the SRH size with enabling flex-algo
with admin group in SRv6 deployment, because without flex-algo we have to have
a big SRH size when the SRH include more SRv6
Clear, thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Li [mailto:tony1ath...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li
> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 11:28 PM
> To: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Christian Hopps
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Congestion (flow) control thoughts.
>
>
> Hi
