Re: [Lsr] draft-lin-lsr-flex-algo-metric-00

2022-03-28 Thread Chenmengxiao
Hi Peter, Sorry to reply late. Please see inline. Thanks, Mengxiao Chen -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 4:16 PM To: chenmengxiao (RD) ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-lin-lsr-flex-algo-metric-00 Hi Mengxiao,

Re: [Lsr] Is it necessary to define new PUB/SUB model to monitor the node live?

2022-03-28 Thread Aijun Wang
Hi, Robert: Let’s don’t make the conclusion in hurry. I think you should know the application scenarios for such unreachable information is not only for BGP services, but also for the tunnel services(for example, SRv6 loose-path routing). For the latter scenario, the P node on the path

Re: [Lsr] Is it necessary to define new PUB/SUB model to monitor the node live?

2022-03-28 Thread Robert Raszuk
Aijun, > For PUAM, the receiver NEED NOT register anything. > Once the node fails, all the receivers(normally the nodes within one area) will be notified. That's a spec bug not a feature. Not only those egress nodes which would have otherwise register will get it with PUAM, but also all P nodes

Re: [Lsr] New Subject: Is Flex-Algo One App or Many (was “RE: IETF13: Comments on The Application Specific Link Attribute (ASLA) Any Application Bit”)

2022-03-28 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi, > I do see new drafts that mistakenly assume ASLA can be used to advertise application specific values. Exactly ! And I do not blame any authors of those new drafts as for anyone with reading skills "Application Specific Link Attribute" means links attributes which correspond to either user