Hi Reshad,
Thanks for the review. You raised some very good points and especially the
point about the OSPFv3 MPLS encoding being missing. We may delay the document
until these are added. However, we will address your comments in the next
revision of the document.
> On Apr 3, 2023, at 23:18,
Louis -
Sorry, one more response from me.
Your responses below, especially regarding the use of algorithm specific
adj-sids in TI-LFA, I could summarize as saying:
"Yes - in a partial deployment scenario - you would not have full functionality
e.g., legacy nodes would be unable to determine
Louis,
On 14/04/2023 16:26, Louis Chan wrote:
Hi Peter (plus all),
I do not think emotional statement could help. We should stick to facts and
evidence, and be professional.
the fact is that with 9k LSP size and 255 LSPs, where each algo ADJ-SID
takes up to 9 bytes, you have enough space
Hi Peter (plus all),
I do not think emotional statement could help. We should stick to facts and
evidence, and be professional.
Please calm down, and enjoy your weekend first. We should have a drink when we
meet.
But there are questions in my mind. I must apologize being a bit blunt in
Weiqiang,
On 14/04/2023 13:36, Weiqiang Cheng wrote:
Hi Peter,
Your information about the deployment is good.
It is clear there are two different application scenarios:
1. For the operators who only need few algos, the current solution is good
enough for them, they just need keep it and don't
Hi Peter,
Your information about the deployment is good.
It is clear there are two different application scenarios:
1. For the operators who only need few algos, the current solution is good
enough for them, they just need keep it and don't need to worry about the
updates.
2. For the operators
Weiqiang,
On 14/04/2023 12:28, Weiqiang Cheng wrote:
Hi Peter,
As far as I know, Flex Algo is not really deployed by operators by now, mainly
because of the scalability concerns.
I know bunch that deployed it and are happy with it. They needed few
algos, which is what I consider the right
Hi Peter,
As far as I know, Flex Algo is not really deployed by operators by now, mainly
because of the scalability concerns.
In fact, the Luois team and our team did not know each other before. However,
we proposed solutions for MPLS-SR and SRv6 respectively almost at the same
time. So you
Louis,
On 14/04/2023 10:25, Louis Chan wrote:
Hi Peter,
I do not think we should divert the focus. It is about efficiency in packing
information.
trying to change the way the protocol encodes existing data is something
that we should not do, unless there is a blocking issue that does not
Hi Peter,
I do not think we should divert the focus. It is about efficiency in packing
information.
If some important info is required to pass as "necessary evil", then it should.
Actually, I am looking forward to applying similar method for other metric or
ASLA, proposed by someone, and not
Louis,
On 14/04/2023 07:38, Louis Chan wrote:
Hi Peter,
For Adj-sid and additional TE requirement, I am not sure what you refer to.
TE requirement or metric requirement? If it is metric related, we have ASLA
draft to address some TE related problem.
(To me, to reduce ASLA advertisement is
Hi Les,
Thanks for the questions. Really appreciate that.
Questions are the good way to achieve mutual understanding, and it gives me a
chance to re-think what to do next.
Please see inline [lc4]
/louis
-Original Message-
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023
12 matches
Mail list logo
