Re: [Lsr] IETF-116 LSR - IGP extensions forAdvertisingOffsetforFlex-Algorithm

Louis Chan writes: Hi Chris, The conversation is about "slow router" in transit position. And as I said, operators do not create artificial choke-points by putting only slow routers in important/critical/core "transit" positions in the network; this would be silly network design,

[Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-03

Reviewer: Barry Leiba Review result: Has Nits I understand why it’s easier to do a single document with a batch update, but I question whether anyone will pay attention to it. Still, until the relevant documents are organically replaced and these changes are actually folded into them, this will

Re: [Lsr] IETF-116 LSR - IGP extensions forAdvertisingOffsetforFlex-Algorithm

Hi Chris, The conversation is about "slow router" in transit position. /Louis -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: Friday, April 21, 2023 5:08 AM To: Louis Chan Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Liyan Gong ; Christian Hopps ; Ketan Talaulikar ; Krzysztof Szarkowicz ; Robert

Re: [Lsr] IETF-116 LSR - IGP extensions forAdvertisingOffsetforFlex-Algorithm

Louis Chan writes: Hi All, Here is an email I would like to address multiple comments and issues. My comment starts with [lc] /Louis 1. About the weakest control plane From Chris. H Operators with 1000s of routers and routers with 1000s of interfaces don't create flooding

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-08

On Apr 20, 2023, at 1:24 PM, Peter Psenak wrote: > > Hi John, > > I usually push txt version and give XML only to RFC Editors. I used to do that too. Also for no particular reason, just habit I guess. > No particular reason, I can upload XML next time. Thanks! It’s not a huge difference for

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-08

Hi John, I usually push txt version and give XML only to RFC Editors. No particular reason, I can upload XML next time. thanks, Peter On 20/04/2023 15:41, John Scudder wrote: [adding individual cc for authors to work around bounce issues] One additional request — when you post your next

Re: [Lsr] Last Call: (IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard

Tom - https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml At the very top it says: "IS-IS TLV Codepoints" Les > -Original Message- > From: tom petch > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:05 AM > To: John Scudder > Cc: cho...@chopps.org;

Re: [Lsr] Last Call: (IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard

Hi Tom, IS-IS TLV Codepoints iana.org

Re: [Lsr] Last Call: (IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard

From: John Scudder Sent: 20 April 2023 13:45 To: tom petch Cc: cho...@chopps.org; draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Last Call: (IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard Hi Tom, Thanks for catching this, sorry I

Re: [Lsr] Last Call: (IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard

Hi Les, > On Apr 20, 2023, at 10:43 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > Also to John - if you have provided a review of the bis draft (as you suggest > below) I don’t seem to have seen it. > Did you send it to the list?? Or are you referring to your comments from last > year which

Re: [Lsr] Last Call: (IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard

Tom - Thanx for catching this. John - will correct this in the next version. Also to John - if you have provided a review of the bis draft (as you suggest below) I don’t seem to have seen it. Did you send it to the list?? Or are you referring to your comments from last year which resulted in

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-08

[adding individual cc for authors to work around bounce issues] One additional request — when you post your next revision, unless you have some specific reason NOT to upload the XML, please do that? It appears that for version 08 you only uploaded the txt rendering, which means there’s no

[Lsr] Last Call: (OSPF Application-Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard

The IESG has received a request from the Link State Routing WG (lsr) to consider the following document: - 'OSPF Application-Specific Link Attributes' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send

Re: [Lsr] Last Call: (IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard

Hi Tom, Thanks for catching this, sorry I missed it in my review. The registry is now named "IS-IS Sub-TLVs for Application-Specific SRLG TLV”, so, OLD: 7.5. Sub-TLVs for TLV 238 Registry IANA has created a new registry titled "Sub-TLVs for TLV 238" under the "IS-IS TLV Codepoints"

Re: [Lsr] Last Call: (IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard

From: Lsr on behalf of The IESG Sent: 19 April 2023 21:01 To: IETF-Announce Cc: cho...@chopps.org; draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919...@ietf.org; j...@juniper.net; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] Last Call: (IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard The IESG has

[Lsr] FW: WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-09 (to end May 4, 2023)

Hi LSR WG, Please find courtesy WGLC cross posting regarding LSVR BGP-SPF draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-09 draft. Any comments or suggestions about the draft are welcome on l...@ietf.org wg email list. Kind Regards, G/ -Original Message- From: Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) Sent: