Hi Les, > On Apr 20, 2023, at 10:43 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Also to John - if you have provided a review of the bis draft (as you suggest > below) I don’t seem to have seen it. > Did you send it to the list?? Or are you referring to your comments from last > year which resulted in the bis draft being created?
I did review the bis, in the sense of, I looked it over. My review, in toto, was “LGTM, ship it”,[1] so I simply sent it to IETF Last Call. Sorry for the ambiguity, I guess in the future when I have nothing substantive to say I should send a “this page intentionally left blank other than this notice” AD Review email.[2] —John [1] So what I meant by my comment was “I should have caught that while looking over the doc”. I think the reason I missed it was, I focused on the diff, and the registry name wasn’t part of the diff… but since the registry name changed since publication of 8919, it SHOULD have been part of the diff. [2] Not snark, this conversation demonstrates that I really should do that. Every time I try to take a shortcut, I get brought up short. Every. Single. Time. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
