Re: [Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-02: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-18 Thread Warren Kumari
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:35 AM, Les Ginsberg wrote: > Warren - > > Thanx for the thoughtful (and entertaining [image: ]) review. > > I have no objection to adding a forward reference to the "changes" section > for both this document and draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis. My only concern is > whether

Re: [Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-02: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-18 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Warren - Thanx for the thoughtful (and entertaining ) review. I have no objection to adding a forward reference to the "changes" section for both this document and draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis. My only concern is whether this violates the guideline that the "abstract should be complete in

[Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-02: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-18 Thread Warren Kumari via Datatracker
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-02: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-18 Thread Warren Kumari via Datatracker
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to