Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

Hi Yingzhen, I support the adoption of this document by the WG. The document has been already widely discussed in the WG for a few years now - the problem is well acknowledged and the solution/approach is the best/practical way to go about it in my opinion. Thanks, Ketan On Fri, Nov 17, 2023

[Lsr] 答复: WG Adoption IPR Poll for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03

Hi Acee， I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document. thanks 赵德涛 软件平台开发一部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 中兴通讯股份有限公司 南京市紫荆花路68号南研一期, 邮编: 210012 T: +86 15951883174 M: +86 15951883174 E: zhao.de...@zte.com.cn Original From: AceeLindem To: draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-fl...@ietf.org

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption IPR Poll for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03

Hi Acee， I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document. Best Regards， Ran Original From:AceeLindem To:draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-fl...@ietf.org; Cc:Lsr; Date:2023-11-17 23:49:12 Subject:[Lsr] WG Adoption IPR Poll for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

Speaking as WG member: Ok - I can see that I’m in the minority here in thinking this should be at a less granular level than specific TLVs. We can see where the more granular definition takes us and I’ll help with the OSPFv2/OSPFv3 models. Hopefully, the enthusiasm for implementation will

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

Support. I've implemented parts of the draft and think it's a practical approach. Thanks, Paul On 11/17/23 11:23, Yingzhen Qu wrote: Hi, This begins a WG adoption call for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv: draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-04 - Multi-part TLVs in IS-IS

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

+2 support adoption as coauthor (Chairs – is it really necessary for the authors to express support for their own draft? ) Les From: Tony Przygienda Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 10:29 AM To: Tony Li Cc: Yingzhen Qu ; draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-...@ietf.org; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

+1, support adoptoinb as co-author On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 6:58 PM Tony Li wrote: > > I support adoption as co-author. > > T > > > On Nov 17, 2023, at 9:23 AM, Yingzhen Qu wrote: > > Hi, > > This begins a WG adoption call for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv: > draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-04 > -

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

I support adoption as co-author. T > On Nov 17, 2023, at 9:23 AM, Yingzhen Qu wrote: > > Hi, > > This begins a WG adoption call for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv: > draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-04 - Multi-part TLVs in IS-IS (ietf.org) >

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft” > On Nov 17, 2023, at 9:05 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

Speaking as WG member: This draft has already resulted in a lot of good discussion and iteration. I support adoption as formalization of the existing solution with configuration, protocol level capability reporting, and IANA multi-TLV specification. Thanks, Acee > On Nov 17, 2023, at 12:23,

[Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

Hi, This begins a WG adoption call for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv: draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-04 - Multi-part TLVs in IS-IS (ietf.org) Please send your support or objection to the list before December 9th, 2023. An extra week

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Les From: Yingzhen Qu Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 9:01 AM To: draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-...@ietf.org; lsr Cc: lsr-chairs Subject: IPR Poll for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv Hi, This is an IPR call for

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draf Juniper Business Use Only From: Yingzhen Qu Date: Friday, 17 November 2023 at 18:00 To: draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-...@ietf.org , lsr Cc: lsr-chairs Subject: IPR Poll for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv [External Email. Be cautious of

[Lsr] IPR Poll for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv

Hi, This is an IPR call for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-04 - Multi-part TLVs in IS-IS (ietf.org) ) The authors and contributors please respond to this IPR call. Please state either: "No, I'm not aware

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption IPR Poll for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03

Hi Acee, I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document. Thanks, Ketan On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 9:24 PM Peter Psenak wrote: > Hi Acee, > > I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03. > > thanks, > Peter > > On 17/11/2023 16:48, Acee Lindem

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03 (Corrected End Date)

Speaking as WG Member: I support WG adoption. These simple extensions for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 are required for consistent, concise, and extendible advertisement of binary prefix attributes. Thanks, Acee > On Nov 17, 2023, at 11:01 AM, Acee Lindem wrote: > > LSR WG, > > This starts the

[Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03 (Corrected End Date)

LSR WG, This starts the Working Group adoption call for draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03. Please send your support or objection to this list before December 9th, 2023. The extra week is to allow for the US Thanksgiving holiday. Thanks, Acee

[Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03

LSR WG, This starts the Working Group adoption call for draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03. Please send your support or objection to this list before December 2nd, 2023. The extra week is to allow for the US Thanksgiving holiday. Thanks, Acee

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption IPR Poll for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03

Hi Acee, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03. thanks, Peter On 17/11/2023 16:48, Acee Lindem wrote: Co-Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance

[Lsr] WG Adoption IPR Poll for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03

Co-Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). There currently aren’t any IPR declarations on this simple protocol

Re: [Lsr] Technical questions for draft about unreachable prefixes announcement

By this logic, when the Prefix Originator is set to 0.0.0.0, it means there is no Prefix Originator ... ;-) Not sure why we are even arguing about this :-( On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 1:50 PM Aijun Wang wrote: > Hi, Ketan: > > The logic is that why we can set router-id equal to 0.0.0.0 to

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

Orange Restricted From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 11:33 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: Loa Andersson ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang Speaking as a WG contributor: Hi Les, I think a simpler name is better -