Some additional thoughts regarding the “name”…
I can understand why people are averse to an old ISO acronym like “PICS” – but
there are some accurately chosen words in that acronym. Let’s examine this:
P = Protocol
This is redundant – implicit given this is about IS-IS
Not needed
I =
Hi,
About the name, here are some suggestions about the module name and prefix:
- ietf-isis-feature-support.yang, isis-fs (YANG Module for IS-IS Feature
Support)
- ietf-isis-conformance-state.yang, isis-cs (YANG Module for IS-IS
Protocol Conformance Statement)
-
