Linda –
When we have polarized positions (for whatever reasons), coming to consensus is
often difficult. Each side tends to dismiss the arguments of the other –
sometimes regardless of merit.
So, maybe the following won’t help – but I am going to give it a try.
Point #1: There are existing
Tony,
I have always had high respect towards your opinion.
I am simply asking questions and concerns as an individual. Hope not getting
into company A is better than company B debate.
Linda
From: Tony Li On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 4:44 PM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc:
Hi Linda,
> Suppose the information to be carried by the Extended IS Reachability (type
> 22) (in Example 4.1) is larger than 255. Does it mean the recipient will
> receive 2 TLVs (both with the Type 22) in one LSA? For legacy routers, the
> second TLV (Type =22) might overwrite the first
Tony,
Questions are inserted below:
Linda
From: Tony Li On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 2:21 PM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: Yingzhen Qu ;
draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-...@ietf.org; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023
- 12/09/2023)
Hi Linda,
> I have the following concerns about the approach proposed by this draft:
>
> Suppose the information to be carried by the Extended IS Reachability (type
> 22) (in Example 4.1) is larger than 255. Does it mean the recipient will
> receive 2 TLVs (both with the Type 22) in one
I have the following concerns about the approach proposed by this draft:
* Suppose the information to be carried by the Extended IS Reachability
(type 22) (in Example 4.1) is larger than 255. Does it mean the recipient will
receive 2 TLVs (both with the Type 22) in one LSA? For legacy
Hi Julien,
Thanks much for your review. I’ve incorporated almost all of your comments in
the -23 version.
See inline.
> On Nov 29, 2023, at 11:03 AM, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
> Routing
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-23.txt is now available. It is a work
item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF.
Title: A YANG Data Model for OSPF Segment Routing
Authors: Yingzhen Qu
Acee Lindem
Jeffrey Zhang
Ing-Wher Chen
Name:
Hi Chongfeng,
Thanks for addressing my comments.
I would just suggest to add some text to the draft to explain the comment
below
*[Chongfeng] This is discussed in the scalability considerations section of
this draft. This mechanism is useful for network scenarios in which the
required number of
From: julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 08:35
Hi Tom,
That looks to me like a human mistake on the CC'ed recipients. Using the
directorate web form may have prevented it, but that would have been
much less fun.
Thanks for your careful checking. I'd be happy to hear your
10 matches
Mail list logo
