Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

> On Feb 1, 2024, at 16:28, Yingzhen Qu wrote: > > Hi, > > The configuration to enable/disable OSPFv3 Extended LSA is for migration, > please refer to RFC 8362 section 6 (RFC 8362 - OSPFv3 Link State > Advertisement (LSA) Extensibility (ietf.org) >

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, The configuration to enable/disable OSPFv3 Extended LSA is for migration, please refer to RFC 8362 section 6 (RFC 8362 - OSPFv3 Link State Advertisement (LSA) Extensibility (ietf.org) ). If it's disabled, the router under attack won't

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flooding-topo-min-degree-09.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-flooding-topo-min-degree-09.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF. Title: Flooding Topology Minimum Degree Algorithm Authors: Huaimo Chen Mehmet Toy Yi Yang Aijun Wang

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

Acee - So in 6.2.1.1 you propose to change: " By sending the Receive Window sub-TLV..." To " By sending the Burst Size sub-TLV..." I agree with that change. Bruno - what do you think? In 6.2.2.2 you propose to change: " In order for the LSP Receive Window to be a useful parameter, an LSP

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi John, > On Feb 1, 2024, at 11:55 AM, John Scudder wrote: > > Hi Acee, Roman, all, > > [top posting, hope that’s OK] > > After talking with Roman about this today, what I understand his position to > be is (at least in part), since the document identifies one specific case of > a type of

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

Hi Bruno, See inline. > On Feb 1, 2024, at 12:30 PM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: > > Hi Acee, > > Thanks for your quick feedback. Please see inline [Bruno2] > >> From: Acee Lindem >> >> Hi Bruno, >> >> Thanks for the work on John’s review comments. See inline. >> >> >>> On Feb 1,

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

> On Feb 1, 2024, at 12:33 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > Acee - > >>> --- >>> //Acee >>> >>> A bigger issue from that historical artifact is that some text refers to >>> "LSP >> Burst Window" when they should refer to the "new" (from -01) "Receive >> Window sub-TLV". That's a

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

Acee - > > --- > > //Acee > > > > A bigger issue from that historical artifact is that some text refers to > > "LSP > Burst Window" when they should refer to the "new" (from -01) "Receive > Window sub-TLV". That's a bigger issue as "in letter" this may be seen as > technical change (even if "in

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

Hi Acee, Thanks for your quick feedback. Please see inline [Bruno2] > From: Acee Lindem > > Hi Bruno, > > Thanks for the work on John’s review comments. See inline. > > > > On Feb 1, 2024, at 09:38, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: > > > > [+Acee as I'm proposing a change which could be seen as

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Acee, Roman, all, [top posting, hope that’s OK] After talking with Roman about this today, what I understand his position to be is (at least in part), since the document identifies one specific case of a type of attack ("The ability to disable OSPFv3 Extended LSA support can result in a

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

Hi Bruno, Thanks for the work on John’s review comments. See inline. > On Feb 1, 2024, at 09:38, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: > > [+Acee as I'm proposing a change which could be seen as a technical change. > Please looks for //Acee ] > > Hi John, > > Many thanks for your careful

Re: [Lsr] Robert Wilton's Yes on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: (with COMMENT)

Hi Rob, > On Feb 1, 2024, at 9:11 AM, Robert Wilton via Datatracker > wrote: > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included

Re: [Lsr] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: (with COMMENT)

Hi Murray, > On Feb 1, 2024, at 02:49, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker > wrote: > > Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-06.txt

Hi all, -06 is meant to address the comments from the AD. AD review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/76gX3R26Eqy96c4a05HWjj5aosU/ Authors reply: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/8hY__gxAIe5z86o4rFjA3Q9fGtA/ A diff from the previous version is available at:

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-06.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-06.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF. Title: IS-IS Fast Flooding Authors: Bruno Decraene Les Ginsberg Tony Li Guillaume Solignac Marek

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

[+Acee as I'm proposing a change which could be seen as a technical change. Please looks for //Acee ] Hi John, Many thanks for your careful review, your comments and your propositions. I'll upload -06 within minutes. Please see inline [Bruno] > From: John Scudder > Sent: Thursday,

[Lsr] Robert Wilton's Yes on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-05

I'm fine with the replies. Thanks! Daniele On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:12 PM Acee Lindem wrote: > Hi Daniele, > > It seems that your comments have either been addressed or at least > responded. Please reply if you wish further discussion. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > On Dec 1, 2023, at 10:42 AM,