Re: [Lsr] [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-06

2024-02-08 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Mirja - Please see inline. LES2: > -Original Message- > From: Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) > Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 5:11 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Cc: tsv-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding@ietf.org; > lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart early

[Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-29: (with COMMENT)

2024-02-08 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-29: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Re: [Lsr] [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-06

2024-02-08 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Hi Les! Please see below. > On 5. Feb 2024, at 23:28, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > Mirja - > > In regards to Section 6.3... > > >> >> Sec 6.3 >> This section is entirely not clear to me. There is no algorithm described >> and I >> would not know how to implement this. > > [LES:]

Re: [Lsr] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-06

2024-02-08 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Hi Bruno, Thanks for your replies. On the high-level I think that some or most of the explanation you provide me below about parameter values, should actually go into the draft. I understand that there is not a one fits all but that’s why min/max values are often more important than